Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

London and Quadrant Housing Trust - Gennemgang af ydervægge – Brandsyn og udbedring Dynamisk Indkøbssystem (DPS)

Åben
Frist
2088 dage tilbage
December 22, 2031
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Reference
032114-2021
Værdi
Ikke oplyst
Lokation
London, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

December 22, 2021

Frist for spørgsmål

December 15, 2031

Frist for tilbud

December 22, 2031

Kontraktens startdato

December 23, 2031

Budget
Ikke oplyst
Varighed
1 måneder
Lokation
London
Type
Restricted Procedure
66
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

London and Quadrant Housing Trust og dets datterselskab Quadrant Construction Services er en af de største udbydere af prisvenlige boliger i Storbritannien og huser over 250.000 mennesker i mere end 95.000 hjem, primært i London og det sydøstlige England. London and Quadrant Housing Trust udbyder ydelser til gennemgang af ydervægge – brandsyn og udbedring for London and Quadrants egne nybyggeriprojekter for at overholde reglerne om offentlige kontrakter fra 2015. Formålet med denne udbudsproces er at etablere et dynamisk indkøbssystem med tilbudsgiverne og London and Quadrant Housing Trust. Datoer og kontraktværdi er estimater og kan ændres. Dette udbud er kun for serviceudbydere og konsulenter.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

16 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (2)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (7)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the application by the deadline: 2031-12-22 18:00:00.
--Apply for admission to the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, which includes mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Be a service provider.
--Be a consultant.
--Be capable of providing external wall review services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate expertise in external wall review.
--Demonstrate expertise in fire inspections.
--Demonstrate expertise in remedial services for external walls.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided information.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

1 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Official PDF VersionPDF
032114-2021_official.pdf

London and Quadrant Housing Trust is establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for service providers and consultants to deliver external wall fire inspections and remedial services for their new build projects across London and the South East.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

66
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender aims to establish a Dynamic Purchasing System for external wall fire inspections and remedial services. While the description outlines the scope and eligibility, the significant lack of detailed documentation and financial information raises concerns regarding transparency and fair competition.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning100/100

The tender explicitly references compliance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, including mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a fundamental legal requirement. The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally permissible procurement procedure.

Klarhed40/100

The description clearly defines the scope of services (external wall review, fire inspections, remedials) and the geographical area. However, the complete absence of detailed tender documents significantly hinders overall clarity regarding specific requirements, evaluation methodology, and contractual terms.

Lack of detailed tender documents.
Ambiguity regarding the 'Restricted' type versus the stated objective of establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Fuldstændighed75/100

The tender is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential information such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, full evaluation criteria, and instructions for tenderers are missing, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

No documents attached.
Missing detailed specifications for services.
Retfærdighed60/100

The lack of detailed information, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and financial requirements, creates an uneven playing field. Without clear and comprehensive documentation, potential bidders cannot fully understand the expectations or how their submissions will be assessed, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less experienced firms.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria.
Absence of specific financial requirements.
Praktisk anvendelighed40/100

The tender's current state, with no attached documents, makes it impractical for potential suppliers to respond effectively. The stated contract duration of 1 month for a DPS is highly unusual and impractical for a system designed for long-term, recurring services.

No documents attached, making it impractical for bidders to prepare a submission.
Impractical 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System, which is typically established for several years.
Datakonsistens100/100

There is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Type: Restricted' and the explicit objective of establishing a 'Dynamic Purchasing System'. While a DPS can be established via a restricted procedure, the primary classification should reflect the DPS nature. Furthermore, the 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a DPS is inconsistent with the typical long-term nature of such systems.

Inconsistency between 'Type: Restricted' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' as the procurement procedure.
Inconsistent 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Bæredygtighed0/100

The provided information does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or economic sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria specified.
No social criteria specified.

Styrker

Clear identification of the procuring organization and service scope.
Explicit reference to Public Contracts Regulations 2015 for legal compliance.
Well-defined eligibility and technical capability requirements for the service type.
Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System, offering flexibility for future call-offs.

Bekymringer

Complete absence of tender documents, making it impossible to assess full requirements.
Estimated value not disclosed, hindering market analysis for potential bidders.
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria, compromising transparency and fairness.
Inconsistent 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System.
No specific financial requirements detailed, creating uncertainty for bidders.

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and full evaluation criteria.
2. Clarify the estimated value of the DPS or provide a clear methodology for future call-off contract values.
3. Correct the 'Contract Duration' to reflect the typical multi-year term of a Dynamic Purchasing System.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline