Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Havne Håndteringsudstyr Reach Stacker

Åben
Frist
24 dage tilbage
April 28, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
018642-2026
Værdi
£600,000
Lokation
Kent, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 02, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 21, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 28, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 13, 2026

Budget
£600,000
Varighed
1 måneder
Lokation
Kent
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Vi søger en Reach Stacker til vores fragtdivision for at understøtte udvidet håndteringskapacitet og operationel effektivitet.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a Reach Stacker is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and there are no reported disputes. The overall legal framework appears sound, though the short contract duration might raise questions about the reasonableness of the timeline for a complex procurement.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required Reach Stacker is concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical specifications makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the precise requirements and how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are present. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries significantly hinders completeness, as bidders cannot fully review the scope and requirements.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are not explicitly tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of detailed documentation and clear evaluation criteria could inadvertently disadvantage smaller or less experienced bidders.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the availability of document URLs limits the practicality for bidders. Financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure

Bekymringer

Missing detailed tender documents
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential for short submission deadline
Lack of e-submission

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full tender documentation with detailed specifications and evaluation criteria.
2. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow adequate preparation time.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline