Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

AT1468 Alternativ undervisningstilbud - Primær, Sekundær, 16+

Åben
Frist
15 dage tilbage
April 20, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
024332-2026
Værdi
£29,040,000
Lokation
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 18, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 13, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 20, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

August 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£29,040,000
Varighed
120 måneder
Lokation
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Luton Council søger godkendte udbydere af alternativ undervisning til elever, der har brug for undervisning til at supplere, udvide eller erstatte den eksisterende læseplan, for elever, der står over for udelukkelse, medicinske årsager, psykiske problemer eller komplekse indlæringsvanskeligheder. Udbydere skal tilbyde undervisning ansigt til ansigt eller online og overholde kvalitetsstandarderne.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

22 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (6)
Teknisk (13)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements detailed in the provided text, beyond passing quality questions and meeting pricing requirements]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be an approved alternative education provider.
--Must be able to meet the needs of learners requiring educational provision to compliment, extend or replace their existing curriculum.
--Must be able to provide either face-to-face provision or online tutorial.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS13
--Ability to provide alternative education provision for learners at risk of or who have been permanently excluded from school.
--Ability to provide alternative education provision for learners unable to access educational provision in a school or further education provision on medical grounds.
--Ability to provide alternative education provision for learners with mental health and anxiety conditions.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Must meet the pricing requirements.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for alternative education provision is generally well-structured with a clear description of services required. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. No disputes are noted. The 'light touch regime' suggests a focus on compliance with quality standards rather than overly prescriptive legalistic requirements.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required alternative education services is detailed, covering various learner needs and provision types (face-to-face, online, vocational, therapeutic, core subjects, SEND). The division into lots and sub-lots is also clear.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and start date. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and the lack of accessible document content are significant omissions.

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open, and the requirements are generally objective, focusing on the ability to provide specific educational services and meet quality standards. The division into lots promotes competition. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to perceived subjectivity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

While the contract start date and duration are clear, the tender does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the availability of documents with content is not confirmed. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission mentioned
Financing information not detailed
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logically consistent.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. It is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear and detailed description of required services
Well-defined lots and sub-lots
Open procedure promoting competition
Sufficient contract duration and estimated value

Bekymringer

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of accessible document content
Unclear e-submission process
Absence of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and contain sufficient detail.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and any associated platforms.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline