RFQ2025/72 - PEACEPLUS 3.6 Krydsende Stier Historier i Bevægelse

This tender is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on submission requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles for below-threshold procurements. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while active, is noted as potentially short.

The description of the programme's objectives and activities is clear and well-articulated. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of the expected capabilities, although specific submission and evaluation criteria are missing.

While basic information like title, reference, organization, and estimated value are present, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of specific submission requirements and detailed evaluation criteria. The lack of content in the attached documents is also a significant drawback.

The tender is open and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The eligibility and technical requirements are objective and focused on capability. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments, and the lack of e-submission options might disadvantage some bidders.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, which is practical. However, the lack of information regarding financing and the absence of an e-submission portal reduce its overall practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.