NFCC Intern Revisionstjeneste

This tender for internal audit services offers a clear description of required services and has generally good data consistency and fairness. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and specific requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, and financials, impacting completeness and potentially practicality.

The tender is classified as 'Below threshold - open competition', suggesting adherence to relevant procurement procedures for its estimated value. The CPV code is specific and appropriate. There are no stated disputes or known regulatory issues. The timeline is provided, but the deadline proximity could be a minor concern depending on local norms.

The description of the required internal audit services, including planning, delivery, and reporting, is clear and well-defined. The technical capability requirements derived from the description are also specific enough to guide potential bidders.

While essential information like title, reference, organization, description, deadline, and value are present, the tender is missing critical details such as explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and submission procedures. The lack of content summaries for attached documents also hinders initial assessment.

The tender is an open competition, and the requirements are described in a way that appears objective and based on the organization's needs. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadline, while somewhat short, is provided. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission, specific document URLs (beyond a general list), and financing details reduces practicality. The absence of specific submission requirements makes the submission process less straightforward.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, deadline, and CPV code are all populated correctly. The dates provided for the deadline and contract start are logical relative to each other, and there are no indicated disputes or suspensions.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as being EU funded, which often comes with sustainability mandates. This suggests a lack of integration of these important considerations.