Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Ekstra plejetjenester

Åben
Frist
5 dage tilbage
April 10, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
021071-2026
Værdi
£21,411,966
Lokation
Merseyside, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 09, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 03, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 10, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

August 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£21,411,966
Varighed
36 måneder
Lokation
Merseyside
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Rådet søger at udpege passende erfarne udbydere til at levere pleje- og støttetjenester af høj kvalitet på tværs af fem ekstra plejehjem inden for Liverpools bygrænse.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

6 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Providers must be suitably experienced.
--Providers must be able to deliver high-quality care and support services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Extra Care Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and the submission process is not fully defined.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is identified as 'Competitive flexible procedure'. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the services required is clear, outlining the need for high-quality care and support in Extra Care Housing schemes. However, the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section is notably sparse, indicating a lack of detailed technical, financial, and submission specifications, which hinders clarity for potential bidders.

Lack of detailed technical requirements
Lack of detailed financial requirements
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start date. However, the crucial 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section is largely empty, and no document content is available for review, significantly impacting the completeness of the tender package.

No document content available
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and has a specified deadline. The procedure is open, suggesting a fair process. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of detailed requirements could lead to subjective assessments, potentially impacting fairness. The availability of documents is also a concern.

No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of detailed requirements may lead to subjective assessment
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, it does not specify e-submission details, nor is there information on financing. The lack of document content also reduces practicality for bidders.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency within the provided information.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and contract duration/start date disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure

Bekymringer

Lack of detailed requirements (technical, financial, submission)
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available for review
No e-submission specified

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria.
3. Make tender documents fully accessible and provide content summaries.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline