Sheen Mount Primærskole ~ Rengøringstilbud

This tender for school cleaning services is generally well-structured, offering clear descriptions and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green procurement, impacting its overall quality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no listed disputes. Deadlines seem reasonable within the context of an open procedure. The 'Competitive flexible procedure' code is missing, which is a minor oversight.

The description of services, school context, and contract terms (fixed price, duration) is clear. Requirements for initiative and innovation are mentioned but could be more precisely defined. The PSQ document is referenced for further details, implying more comprehensive information is available elsewhere.

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and start date is present. The current contract value is disclosed, which is helpful. However, the content of the attached 'PSQ Document' is not available, and the full tender documentation is not detailed.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria mention that the Governing body is not obliged to accept the lowest price, promoting a value-based selection. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies, enhancing fairness. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments.

The tender specifies contract duration and start date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The crucial point is the lack of information regarding e-submission, and the availability of documents is unclear as no content is provided. The reference to an attached plan suggests some documents are present but not accessible.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration are populated consistently. Dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The estimated value and current contract value provide a clear financial context.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation incentives, which are becoming increasingly important in public tenders. While 'initiative and innovation will be welcomed,' it is not a formally assessed criterion or requirement.