Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Målgruppetest – Onlinebilletter til almindelig adgang

Åben
Frist
2 dage tilbage
April 06, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
023762-2026
Værdi
£12,000
Lokation
Inner London - West, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 16, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 30, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 06, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

April 12, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£12,000
Varighed
5 måneder
Lokation
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Som en del af projektet for onlinebilletter til almindelig adgang vil Science Museum Group (SMG) opdatere den måde, hvorpå almindelige besøgende booker billetter på vores museums hjemmeside. Som en del heraf ønsker SMG at udpege en leverandør til at teste en tidlig version af den opdaterede online booking-rejse med målgrupper. Ved at indsamle feedback fra vores målgrupper under udviklingsprocessen ønsker vi at identificere og adressere eventuelle potentielle brugervenlighedsproblemer før vores lanceringsdato i juli 2026 og fremover.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for audience testing of an online ticketing system is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and basic information provided. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and specific requirements, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure for below-threshold open competition. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline relative to the contract start date might be tight. No disputes are reported.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the project and the objective of appointing a supplier for audience testing is clear. The purpose of gathering feedback to address usability issues before the launch is well-articulated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of how proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the tender documents are not accessible with content, and there are no specific listed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, or submission, which significantly impacts completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical capability, financial, or submission
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, contributing to fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand the assessment process objectively.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract start date is specified, and the duration is reasonable. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission mentioned
Document URL not provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logically sequenced, with the contract start date following the submission deadline.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear project description and objectives
Open competition procedure
Basic tender information is present

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for proposals.
2. Provide access to the full content of tender documents.
3. Detail specific requirements for bidders in each category.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline