Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

King Street Renovering

Åben
Frist
18 dage tilbage
April 23, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
017822-2026
Værdi
£750,000
Lokation
Lancashire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Februar 27, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 16, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 23, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juli 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£750,000
Varighed
9 måneder
Lokation
Lancashire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Renovering af 87 King Street Lancaster og tilhørende udvendige arbejder

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for King Street Refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall clarity and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which suggests adherence to relevant regulations for its value.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the refurbishment work is concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission, making it unclear how bids will be assessed. The lack of document content also hinders a thorough understanding of the requirements.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, the crucial tender documents are listed as having '0' documents with content/summaries, which severely impacts completeness. The contract duration and start date are specified.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is not inherently restrictive. However, the lack of accessible document content and specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, though not necessarily unfair in intent.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission details and the lack of accessible document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical in sequence.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and deadline disclosed
CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission mentioned
Lack of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents accessible with content or summaries.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into future tenders.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline