Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Strengthening of wall cracks in the multi-apartment residential building at Imantas Street 11, Daugavpils, in accordance with the project

Lukket

Fristen for indsendelse er overskredet

Fristen for indsendelse af dette udbud er overskredet, og der modtages ikke længere ansøgninger. Oplysningerne nedenfor er gemt til referenceformål.

Gennemse aktive udbud
Frist
Udløbet
Marts 23, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Byggeri
Reference
167527
Værdi
€25,000
Lokation
Latgale, Letland
Udgivet
Marts 05, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 05, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 16, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Marts 23, 2026

Åbning af udbud

Marts 23, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€25,000
Varighed
3 måneder
Lokation
Latgale
Type
Byggeri
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€491,981
Gns. Tilbud
3.0
Konkurrence
Lav
SMV Vindere
99%
20,606 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Strengthening of wall cracks in the multi-apartment residential building at Imantas Street 11, Daugavpils, in accordance with the project

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

75%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender presents a straightforward opportunity for experienced construction firms specializing in building repairs. The low estimated value and lack of specific requirements suggest a potentially less competitive field, favoring bidders who can demonstrate efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and a clear understanding of the project scope. A focus on a competitive price, coupled with a robust technical proposal that addresses the 'Projekts' document (even if content is not yet extracted), will be crucial.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Reliable and Cost-Effective Crack Reinforcement for Daugavpils Residents

Efficient Project Execution within Budget and Timeline

Nøglemuligheder
Low estimated value may deter larger competitors, creating a niche for specialized SMEs.
Absence of explicit technical, financial, and eligibility requirements suggests a focus on the bidder's ability to interpret and execute the 'Projekts'.
The short duration (3 months) favors bidders with readily available resources and efficient project management.
Nøgleudfordringer
The content of the 'Projekts' document is not yet extracted, creating uncertainty about the exact technical specifications and scope of work.

Proactively request clarification from the contracting authority regarding the 'Projekts' document and its availability. If not provided, base the technical proposal on standard best practices for crack reinforcement in similar structures and clearly state assumptions made. Prioritize obtaining this document immediately.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for maximum scoring.

Assume a price-driven evaluation, but also focus on demonstrating technical competence and a clear understanding of the project. Highlight any relevant past experience and the qualifications of the proposed team. Prepare a comprehensive technical proposal that addresses all potential aspects of crack reinforcement.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A small to medium-sized construction company with proven experience in multi-apartment building repairs, specifically crack reinforcement. The ideal bidder will have a strong local presence in Daugavpils or the surrounding region, allowing for efficient logistics and potentially lower overhead. They should possess the necessary certifications and a skilled workforce capable of executing the project within the 3-month timeframe.
Nøglekrav
Strengthening cracks in apartment building walls in Daugavpils according to the project.
Submission of a technical and financial proposal.
Adherence to tender regulations and deadlines.
Nøgledifferentiatorer
A highly competitive and transparent pricing strategy that clearly demonstrates value for money.
A detailed and well-structured technical proposal that anticipates potential challenges and outlines a clear, efficient execution plan, even with limited initial project details.
Demonstrated local knowledge and understanding of Daugavpils building stock and repair needs.
Muligheder for social værdi
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a commitment to employing local labor for the project, contributing to the Daugavpils community.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Price

Develop a highly competitive price by optimizing material sourcing, labor efficiency, and minimizing overhead. Conduct thorough cost analysis based on similar past projects and market rates for Daugavpils.

Technical Proposal

Create a detailed proposal outlining methodology, materials, quality control, and a realistic timeline. Emphasize experience with similar crack reinforcement projects. Clearly articulate how the proposed solution will address the structural integrity issues.

Anbefalinger6
Obtain and Thoroughly Analyze 'Projekts' Document
KritiskHøj indsats

Immediately request the 'Projekts' document from the contracting authority. Thoroughly analyze its contents to understand the specific technical requirements, materials, and scope of work for crack reinforcement. This is paramount for developing an accurate and compliant bid.

Ensures bid compliance and technical accuracy, preventing disqualification and rework.
Develop a Highly Competitive Price
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, assume price will be a significant factor. Conduct detailed costings to offer a price that is both competitive and profitable, reflecting efficient project management and material procurement.

Increases the likelihood of winning a price-sensitive tender.
Highlight Local Expertise and Efficiency
HøjMedium indsats

Emphasize the bidder's experience working in Daugavpils and their understanding of local building conditions. Showcase a streamlined operational model that allows for efficient execution within the tight 3-month timeframe.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver on time and within budget.
Prepare a Robust Technical Proposal
HøjHøj indsats

Even without explicit requirements, a detailed technical proposal demonstrating a clear understanding of crack reinforcement techniques, quality assurance, and a realistic project plan is essential. Include resumes of key personnel and relevant past project examples.

Demonstrates technical capability and builds trust with the contracting authority.
Address Potential Ambiguities in the Bid
MediumMedium indsats

If the 'Projekts' document remains unavailable or unclear, clearly state any assumptions made in the bid regarding materials, methods, or scope. This protects the bidder from future disputes.

Minimizes contractual risks and potential disputes.
Consider Local Employment Commitment
LavLav indsats

Although not a formal requirement, a brief mention of a commitment to employing local Daugavpils residents for the project can be a positive differentiator, aligning with broader public sector expectations.

Enhances the bidder's image and potentially appeals to the contracting authority's broader objectives.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective and efficient solution for a critical building repair, leveraging local expertise and a streamlined operational approach. Emphasize reliability and a clear understanding of the project's needs, even with limited initial information.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

4 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167527_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260305145027.pdf -- 99.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for strengthening cracks in apartment building walls in Daugavpils, including technical and financial proposal specifications.

Vis
ProjektsDOC
imantas-projekts.rar.bin -- 5.6 MB

No content extracted

Vis
Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums nps-2026-02.docx -- 98.5 KB

This document contains the tender regulations for strengthening cracks in the walls of a multi-apartment residential building in Daugavpili, with a deadline for submission of offers on March 23, 2026.

Vis
Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender NPS 2026/02, which involves strengthening cracks in apartment building walls in Daugavpils, with a deadline for submission of offers on March 23, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for wall crack reinforcement in Daugavpils is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and potential restrictions on document access, impacting fairness and completeness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of work. The procedure is open, which is a positive indicator of legal compliance.

Klarhed80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the existence of specific documents for requirements (technical specifications) indicates an effort towards clarity. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is notably empty, and the 'unknown' type for the 'Projekts' document raises concerns about completeness of attached documentation.

No specific requirements provided in AI-extracted section
Type of 'Projekts' document is unknown
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a concern. Potential restricted document access is flagged as an issue.

Restricted document access
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is likely. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics'. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (marked as E-Procurement but flagged as 'No e-submission')
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates, and value are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided
Reasonable timeline and contract duration
Estimated value disclosed
E-Procurement characteristic indicated

Bekymringer

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations
Incomplete AI-extracted requirements

Anbefalinger

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Integrate sustainability aspects where applicable.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline