Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Rammeaftale for levering af M&E-tjenester

Åben
Frist
18 dage tilbage
April 23, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
026398-2026
Værdi
£2,000,000
Lokation
East of England, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 23, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 16, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 23, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

August 31, 2026

Budget
£2,000,000
Varighed
60 måneder
Lokation
East of England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Unity Schools Partnership kræver, at entreprenører tilslutter sig deres nye rammeaftale for at påtage sig M&E-tjenester og byggearbejder. Rammeaftalen er opdelt i partier, og enhver udbyder kan forsøge at tilslutte sig enhver af tjenesterne. Udbyderen skal altid være i overensstemmelse med god branchepraksis for at levere en høj standard af service på tværs af Trusten til gavn for Trustens personale og elever, lokalsamfundet og for at skabe et indbydende miljø for besøgende.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

6 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Providers must be in accordance with good industry practice.
--Providers must provide a high standard of service.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for M&E Services and Construction Works is generally well-structured but lacks specific technical and financial requirements, and crucial evaluation criteria are missing. The CPV code appears mismatched with the stated service.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements for an open procedure, with a specified CPV code, organization, and clear procedure type. However, the CPV code 'Construction work (45000000)' seems incongruent with 'M&E Services', suggesting a potential misclassification. Deadlines are provided but the fairness of the submission deadline is debatable.

CPV code potentially mismatched with service description.
Klarhed80/100

The description of services is broad, emphasizing 'good industry practice' and 'high standard of service' without detailing specific technical capabilities or performance indicators. This vagueness necessitates further clarification from bidders.

Lack of specific technical capability requirements.
Absence of detailed performance indicators for 'high standard of service'.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Essential information such as estimated value, contract duration, and contract start date are provided. However, the absence of detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant gaps for potential bidders.

Missing specific technical capability requirements.
Missing specific financial requirements.
Retfærdighed85/100

The open procedure and clear disclosure of estimated value contribute to fairness. The framework is divided into lots, allowing broad participation. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot objectively assess how their submissions will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

While key dates and duration are specified, the tender does not indicate an e-submission process, which is a common and expected feature in modern procurement. Financing information is not detailed, and the contract start date appears reasonable.

No indication of e-submission process.
Financing information not detailed.
Datakonsistens90/100

The core data fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logically sequenced, although the submission deadline's proximity to the contract start date is noted.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social responsibility, or innovation aspects, which are becoming increasingly important in public tenders.

No mention of green procurement requirements.
No mention of social aspects.

Styrker

Clear title, reference number, and organization.
Estimated value and contract duration specified.
Framework structure with lots allows broad participation.

Bekymringer

Missing crucial evaluation criteria.
Vague technical and financial requirements.
Potential mismatch between CPV code and service description.

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria and weighting.
2. Detail technical and financial requirements for each lot.
3. Verify and correct the CPV code if it is indeed mismatched.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline