Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Omkonfigurering/renovering af 2. sal og toiletblok i Raymond Edwards bygningen

Åben
Frist
19 dage tilbage
April 24, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
028417-2026
Værdi
£120,000
Lokation
West Wales and The Valleys, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 27, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 17, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

August 02, 2026

Budget
£120,000
Varighed
1 måneder
Lokation
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama (RWCMD) søger en byggefirma til renoveringsarbejder i Raymond Edwards bygningen. Dette omfatter omkonfigurering af kontorlokaler på 2. sal til et stort klasseværelse og to agile arbejdsrum, samt renovering af toiletblokken på 1. sal. Arbejdet omfatter nedrivning, nyt loft og belysning, datakanaler, gulvbelægning, dekoration, klimaanlæg, tekøkken og møbelinstallation. Arbejdet i toiletblokken omfatter udskiftning af sanitetsudstyr, gulvbelægning og dekoration.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

15 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (11)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a construction partner.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Ability to carry out refurbishment works in the Raymond Edwards building.
--Experience with demolition of existing internal walls.
--Experience with blocking up redundant doorways.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for refurbishment works is generally well-structured with clear descriptions and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which is a valid classification.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the refurbishment works is detailed and specific, outlining the scope for both the 2nd floor and the toilet block. The AI-extracted technical requirements are directly derived from this description, indicating good clarity on the expected deliverables.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, crucial details such as specific submission requirements and evaluation criteria are missing, which significantly impacts completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific submission requirements detailed
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements are described objectively based on the scope of work, without apparent tailoring to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied by the active status, though not explicitly stated. The deadline is reasonable for the scope.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs for the 4 attached documents reduce practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission explicitly mentioned
Document URLs not provided for attached documents
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically ordered.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear and detailed description of works
Specific CPV code provided
Estimated value disclosed
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific submission requirements
No explicit mention of e-submission
Absence of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Provide detailed submission requirements and instructions.
3. Clarify e-submission procedures and provide direct links to tender documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline