Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Rammeaftale for 4x4 køretøjer

Åben
Frist
24 dage tilbage
April 28, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
027967-2026
Værdi
£900,000
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 21, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 28, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 22, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£900,000
Varighed
48 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Denne rammeaftale omhandler levering af 4x4 køretøjer til East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for 4x4 vehicles is generally well-structured with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting clarity and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could be a legal compliance issue if not addressed in the full documentation.

Missing evaluation criteria
Klarhed80/100

The description of the framework is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expected documentation. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of document content make it difficult to fully understand the technical and qualitative expectations.

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and start date. However, the critical issue of missing document content prevents a full assessment of completeness. The AI-extracted requirements suggest a comprehensive set of mandatory documents, but their absence is a significant gap.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender appears fair, with an open procedure and disclosed value. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are mentioned, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria.

Missing evaluation criteria
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission and the lack of accessible document content significantly reduce practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not raise immediate concerns.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Open procedure indicated

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission
Lack of sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full tender documentation with clear evaluation criteria.
2. Implement an e-submission process for improved accessibility.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation criteria.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline