Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

UKRI-5602 MRC LMB Bortskaffelse af klinisk affald

Åben
Frist
25 dage tilbage
April 30, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
025820-2026
Værdi
£450,000
Lokation
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 20, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 23, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 30, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 07, 2026

Budget
£450,000
Varighed
24 måneder
Lokation
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Levering af bortskaffelsestjenester for klinisk affald hos UKRI-LMB

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for clinical waste disposal services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code, indicating a degree of regulatory compliance. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and there are no reported disputes. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The title and description clearly state the service required. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, providing a framework for bidders. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the critical absence of accessible tender documents with content or summaries severely hinders completeness, as bidders cannot fully understand the scope and specific requirements.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are standard. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less objective, but there are no overt signs of tailoring to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission is a significant drawback in modern procurement. The lack of explicit financing information and the inability to access document content reduce practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract start date is logically after the submission deadline. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, ensuring good data consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these important sustainability dimensions.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value)
Open procedure with disclosed value
CPV code provided
Standard requirement categories listed

Bekymringer

No accessible tender documents with content
Missing specific evaluation criteria
No e-submission functionality
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full access to tender documents with detailed content.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate e-submission for improved practicality and efficiency.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline