Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

GLE Major Works Renewal Programme - Professionelle ydelser efter kontrakt

Åben
Frist
87 dage tilbage
Juni 30, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Reference
011382-2026
Værdi
£1,800,000
Lokation
London, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Februar 09, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Juni 23, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Juni 30, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 30, 2026

Budget
£1,800,000
Varighed
135 måneder
Lokation
London
Type
Restricted Procedure
63
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Søger tværfaglige konsulentydelser efter kontrakt for Golden Lane Estate Major Works Renewal Programme. Ydelserne omfatter kontraktsadministration, arbejdsgiverrepræsentant, mængdeinspektion og byggeleder for større renovering af ni fredede boligblokke (vinduer, tage, brandsikkerhed, elektrisk overensstemmelse, ventilation, dekorationer, facaderenoveringer). Dette dækker RIBA-stadierne 4B-7 og omfatter processer for højrisikobygninger. Udbuddet sker via en konkurrencepræget fleksibel procedure, hvor tildelingen sker til det mest fordelagtige tilbud.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

21 krav på tværs af 3 kategorier

Indsendelse (3)
Overholdelse (9)
Teknisk (9)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission by the deadline: 2026-07-01T00:00:00+01:00.
--Participation in a Competitive Flexible Procedure.
--Tender must be prepared to be evaluated based on the Most Advantageous Tender criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Ability to provide multidisciplinary consultant services.
--Ability to provide Contract Administration services.
--Ability to provide Employer’s Agent services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Demonstrated expertise in Contract Administration for post-contract phases.
--Demonstrated expertise as an Employer’s Agent for post-contract phases.
--Demonstrated expertise in Quantity Surveying for post-contract phases.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

4 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

OCDS RecordDOC
011382-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record details the procurement of multidisciplinary consultant services, including Contract Administration, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, for the Golden Lane Estate's major refurbishment program across RIBA Stages 4B–7.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
011382-2026_ocds_release.json

This tender seeks multidisciplinary consultants for post-contract services, including Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, to support the major refurbishment of nine listed residential blocks in London, requiring expertise across RIBA Stages 4B-7 and Higher-Risk Building Gateway processes.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
011382-2026_official.pdf

This tender seeks multidisciplinary consultant services, including Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, for the post-contract phase of a major refurbishment programme for nine listed residential blocks in London, valued at an estimated £1.5 million.

Vis
Tender NoticeHTM
011382-2026.html

UK tender document 'Tender Notice - GLE Major Works Renewal Programme - Post Contract ' in .HTML format.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

63
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender provides a clear and detailed project description but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission, impacting transparency and practicality. Data inconsistencies, particularly regarding dates, also present a concern.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning80/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, with a clearly defined procedure type and appropriate CPV codes. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the reveal date is missing, and some procedural codes are not populated, representing minor administrative oversights.

Missing reveal date
Some procedural codes are not populated
Klarhed60/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear, detailed, and unambiguous, covering services, RIBA stages, and specific works. The critical flaw is the explicit absence of detailed evaluation criteria, which significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how their proposals will be assessed, despite mentioning 'Most Advantageous Tender'.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed65/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. However, the crucial absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
Liable Person field is empty
Retfærdighed60/100

The lack of detailed evaluation criteria severely impacts the transparency and objectivity of the tender process, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and relevant proposals. The absence of an e-submission option also creates a barrier to equal access. While requirements are specific, they appear justified by the project's nature rather than being tailored to a specific company.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission) option
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The absence of an electronic submission system is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the lack of e-submission reduces the overall practicality of the tender process.

No electronic submission (e-submission) option
Datakonsistens55/100

A major inconsistency is the identical submission deadline (2026-06-30 23:00:00) and contract start date (2026-06-30 23:00:00), which is highly illogical. There's also a slight discrepancy between the basic info and AI-extracted submission deadlines. Several key fields like 'Liable Person' and procedural codes are unpopulated, indicating incomplete data entry.

Submission deadline and contract start date are identical
Slight discrepancy in submission deadline between sources
Bæredygtighed30/100

The tender documentation does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus criteria. While the project involves refurbishment, which can have inherent sustainability benefits, these are not framed as procurement objectives or evaluation factors.

No explicit sustainability criteria
No explicit social criteria

Styrker

Clear and detailed project description
Specific and comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
All basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, duration) is provided
CPV codes are appropriately assigned
Documents are available and summarized

Bekymringer

Absence of detailed evaluation criteria for 'Most Advantageous Tender'
Lack of electronic submission option
Inconsistency between submission deadline and contract start date
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing reveal date and some procedural codes

Anbefalinger

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.
3. Review and correct all date inconsistencies, especially between the submission deadline and contract start date.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline