Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

PR142026 Exeter City Council Anmodning om tilbud på rådgivning om økonomi og modstandsdygtighed

Åben
Frist
6 dage tilbage
April 10, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
026226-2026
Værdi
£936,000
Lokation
Devon, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 23, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 03, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 10, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

April 30, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£936,000
Varighed
11 måneder
Lokation
Devon
Type
Open Procedure
69
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Exeter City Council bestiller en rådgivningstjeneste om økonomi og modstandsdygtighed som en del af Kris- og Modstandsdygtighedsfonden (CARF). Tjenesten vil yde indkomstmaksimering, budgetstøtte, rådgivning om prioritetsgæld, opsparings- og indkomstglatningsinterventioner samt praktisk fortalervirksomhed for at hjælpe beboerne med at modstå og komme sig efter finansielle chok. Udbyderen vil fungere som den primære varm-henvisningsdestination fra Krisebetalinger, Boligbetalinger, Boligbehov og NGO-partnere, og levere en traumeinformeret, tilgængelig, flerkanals tjeneste.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

14 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (10)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Must be capable of providing a Money Advice & Resilience Service.
--Must be able to deliver income maximisation.
--Must be able to deliver budgeting support.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
69
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a Money Advice & Resilience Service is generally well-structured with clear objectives but lacks detailed technical and submission requirements, and has limited sustainability considerations.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning70/100

The tender adheres to basic legal compliance by specifying a clear procedure (competitive flexible procedure) and providing a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria might pose minor compliance risks if interpreted strictly.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
No evaluation criteria specified
Klarhed75/100

The description of the service required is clear and detailed, outlining the expected outcomes and the role of the provider. Eligibility requirements are well-defined. However, the lack of specificity in technical capability, financial, and submission requirements leaves room for interpretation and potential ambiguity for bidders.

No specific technical capability requirements detailed
No specific financial requirements detailed
Fuldstændighed65/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. The description is detailed. However, crucial details regarding technical capabilities, financial requirements, and specific submission instructions are missing, which impacts the overall completeness of the documentation.

No specific technical capability requirements detailed
No specific financial requirements detailed
Retfærdighed80/100

The tender offers good fairness by disclosing the estimated value and providing a clear description of the service and eligibility criteria. The competitive flexible procedure suggests a structured evaluation process. However, the lack of detailed technical and submission requirements, along with unspecified evaluation criteria, could inadvertently favor bidders with prior experience with the council or those willing to make assumptions.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific technical capability requirements detailed
Praktisk anvendelighed60/100

While the tender has a specified contract start date and duration, the lack of information on e-submission, document URLs (beyond the basic availability of 4 documents), and detailed financing information limits its practicality for potential bidders. The availability of document content is also a concern.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated consistently. No disputes or suspensions are reported. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are logically ordered.

Bæredygtighed30/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding requirements. This suggests a limited focus on sustainability, which is a missed opportunity to align with broader public sector objectives.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear service description and objectives
Well-defined eligibility requirements
Specified estimated value and contract duration
Competitive flexible procedure indicated

Bekymringer

Lack of detailed technical and submission requirements
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Limited sustainability considerations
No document content provided for review

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed technical capability and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for fair assessment.
3. Incorporate sustainability objectives into the tender.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline