Increase of nominal current of fuse (LC4571) at Tartu Kindergarten Meelespea, Tartu County, City of Tartu, Ilmatsalu street 24a

This tender for increasing the nominal current of a fuse at Tartu Lasteaed Meelespea is heavily weighted on price. Success hinges on a highly competitive cost submission, supported by demonstrable experience and strict adherence to Elektrilevi's technical and personnel requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicit criteria, demonstrating reliability and efficiency will be key differentiators.

Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) through aggressive pricing and proven delivery.

Unquestionable technical and personnel compliance with Elektrilevi standards.

Reliable and efficient execution to meet the 18.05.2026 deadline.

Aggressively price the bid. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns to identify areas for optimization. Ensure the 'Total (Work Cost)' line in the cost table is as low as possible while remaining profitable and compliant.

Immediately confirm that all required personnel (with switching rights and responsibility for work operations) are registered and active in the Elektrilevi partner portal. This is a non-negotiable requirement.

Given the 100% cost evaluation, develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. This involves meticulous cost estimation, efficient resource allocation, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract.

Provide detailed and accurate information for at least three similar electrical construction works contracts completed within the last 60 months, ensuring one contract meets the 40,000 EUR minimum value. Clearly highlight the scope, value, and successful completion of these projects.

Ensure full understanding and compliance with the latest version of Elektrilevi's standard contract terms. Incorporate any relevant clauses or requirements into the bid proposal and project execution plan.

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly emphasize the bidder's ability to manage projects efficiently and deliver on time. This can be done through concise project plans or brief statements on operational excellence, indirectly supporting the low-cost objective.

Review the electrical project documentation ('Lähteülesanne') for potential ambiguities or complexities. Include a small, justifiable contingency in the cost table for minor unforeseen issues, but ensure the base price remains highly competitive.

This tender provides a clear description of electrical installation works and outlines specific eligibility and technical requirements. While generally well-structured, it lacks explicit focus on sustainability aspects.

The tender appears to adhere to standard procurement procedures. The CPV code is specified, and the overall structure suggests regulatory compliance. Deadlines are present and reasonable. No immediate disputes or legal issues are flagged.

The tender document is clear in its description of the required electrical installation works. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-documented. Evaluation criteria are stated to be based on economic advantage with the lowest price as the best option.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, some key documents are in unsupported formats (.zip, .xls), potentially hindering a full assessment of completeness and preventing detailed analysis of attached documentation.

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. Objective criteria, such as experience and contract value, are used for qualification. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a level playing field.

The tender specifies e-submission and e-procurement. A contract start date is provided. Financing conditions, including payment terms and the option for factoring, are detailed, although the specific URL for factoring program details is provided. However, the mention of .zip and .xls files not being supported for AI analysis suggests potential practical challenges in document accessibility or processing for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical and follow a standard procurement timeline.

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' as a characteristic. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as specific criteria or requirements within the tender document.