Audit Service for Põhja-Sakala Municipality (Repeat Tender)
StängdUrsprunglig beskrivning av upphandling
Kör riskanalys
Identifiera potentiella risker, inkonsekvenser och varningsflaggor i alla upphandlingsdokument. Få en detaljerad riskrapport med allvarlighetsgrader och rekommendationer för åtgärder.
Logga inVinnande strategi
Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.
Logga inKonkurrenter
Uppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.
Logga inKrav och kvalifikationer
19 krav inom 5 kategorier
Förhandsgranskning av krav
Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser
Dokument
10 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar
This document outlines the general conditions for submitting a bid, requiring confirmation of compliance with tender documents, adherence to the specified cost submission structure, and the submission of annexes regarding past contracts and auditor details.
Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.
Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.
This document is a tender cost calculation form to be filled with unit prices for auditing services and consultations for Põhja-Sakala rural municipality and its subsidiary for 2025 and 2026.
This document outlines that the tender for audit services for Põhja-Sakala municipality will be evaluated solely based on the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the conditions and qualification requirements for Põhja-Sakala municipality's audit services tender for 2025-2026, but it is not intended for submission.
This document is a draft contract for the provision of audit services to Põhja-Sakala Municipality and its subsidiary, outlining the terms, parties, and scope of the service.
Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.
Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.
Bidders must complete and submit the audit service schedule, detailing dates and descriptions of activities for both Põhja-Sakala Vallavalitsus and Aktsiaseltsi Põhja-Sakala Haldus, ensuring the report is issued by June 1st.
Förhandsgranskning av dokument
Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser
Upphandlingskvalitetspoäng
This tender for audit services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and requirements. However, a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria significantly undermines its clarity, fairness, and data consistency.
Poängfördelning
The tender generally complies with national regulations, including reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. However, the contradiction in evaluation criteria presents a significant legal risk that could lead to challenges.
While the overall description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the fundamental contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria creates significant ambiguity for bidders. The unanalyzed .rtf documents also pose a risk to overall clarity.
Most essential information is provided, including basic details, financial data, and timelines. However, the inability to analyze the content of several key .rtf documents (e.g., Terms of Reference, Instructions) limits the completeness of the accessible information.
The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, which promotes fairness. However, the critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria directly impacts transparency and fairness, as bidders may not know the true basis for award.
The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, and key dates are clearly specified. The use of .rtf format for some documents, while generally readable, might present minor practical inconveniences for some automated systems or bidders.
A critical inconsistency exists between the 'PROCUREMENT CHARACTERISTICS' stating 'relative_weighting' for evaluation criteria and 'Document 4: Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' specifying 'lowest price' as the sole evaluation method. This is a major data consistency flaw.
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU funded. This is common for audit services but results in a low score for this category.
Styrkor
Potentiella problem
Rekommendationer
Förhandsgranskning av AI-poäng
Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser
Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter
AI-assistent
Hej! Jag är din AI-assistent för denna upphandling. Jag kan hjälpa dig att förstå krav, deadlines, behörighetskriterier och ge strategiska insikter.
Inget kreditkort krävs