Behöver du hjälp av en upphandlingsexpert? Se vår tjänst för anbudsförberedelse
Upphandlingar

Purchase of supplementary feed for cattle

Stängd

Sista anbudsdag har passerat

Sista anbudsdag för denna upphandling har passerat och inga fler ansökningar accepteras. Informationen nedan sparas för referensändamål.

Bläddra bland aktiva upphandlingar
Sista anbudsdag
Utgånget
30 januari 2026
Avtalsdetaljer
Kategori
Leveranser
Referens
304468
Värde
€320,000
Plats
Estonia, Estland
Publicerad
31 december 2025
CPV-kod
Tidsplan för projektet

Upphandling publicerad

31 december 2025

Sista dag för frågor

23 januari 2026

Sista anbudsdag

30 januari 2026

Anbudsöppning

30 januari 2026

VinstsannolikhetPRO
🔒
Uppgradera till Professional
Se din uppskattade vinstsannolikhet baserat på historisk data.
Uppgradera till Professional →
KöparinsikterPRO
🔒
Lås upp köparinsikter
Se utgiftsmönster, föredragna procedurer och mer.
Uppgradera till Professional →
SektorinsikterPRO
🔒
Lås upp sektorinsikter
Se genomsnittliga vinnande priser, konkurrensnivåer och marknadstrender.
Uppgradera till Professional →
Budget
€320,000
Varaktighet
Ej angivet
Plats
Estonia
Typ
Leveranser
84
Kvalitetspoäng/100
Utmärkt
Marknadsjämförelse
Genomsnittligt vinnande pris
€35,753
Genomsnittligt antal anbud
1.6
Konkurrens
Låg
Vinnande små och medelstora företag
95%
110 analyserade upphandlingar

Ursprunglig beskrivning av upphandling

Hankija ostab täiendsööta veistele. Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad tabelis on kirjeldus, millele peab kaup vastama. Kogused on arvestuslikud ja võivad lepingu kehtivus ajal muutuda.
Elektronisk inlämning

Kör riskanalys

Identifiera potentiella risker, inkonsekvenser och varningsflaggor i alla upphandlingsdokument. Få en detaljerad riskrapport med allvarlighetsgrader och rekommendationer för åtgärder.

Logga in

Vinnande strategi

Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.

Logga in

Konkurrenter

Uppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.

Logga in

Krav och kvalifikationer

13 krav inom 5 kategorier

Inlämning (6)
Obligatorisk (1)
Regelefterlevnad (2)
Teknisk (2)
Ekonomisk (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted by 30 January 2026 at 11:00:00.
--The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) must be submitted electronically.
--Compliance of the bid with the tender basic documents must be confirmed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must meet the qualification requirements described in the tender documents.
--The bid must comply with the tender basic documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The subject of the bid is supplementary feed for cattle.
--The bidder must be capable of supplying supplementary feed for cattle according to the draft contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid (excluding taxes) is the sole evaluation criterion.
--The total cost of the bid must be submitted excluding taxes.

Förhandsgranskning av krav

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Dokument

4 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar

VastavustingimusedPDF
304468_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.0 KB

This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including confirming offer compliance with tender documents, the procedure for submitting costs, and requirements for declaring business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304468_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.4 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the "Purchase of supplementary feed for cattle" tender, specifying that the total cost (excluding taxes) will be the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304468_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.6 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing general tender information and the bidder qualification requirements to be submitted electronically.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
HANKELEPINGU PROJEKT.docx -- 29.0 KB

This document is a draft sales contract for the procurement of supplementary feed for cattle, outlining the parties involved and the general terms of the agreement.

Förhandsgranskning av dokument

Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser

84
Utmärkt

Upphandlingskvalitetspoäng

This tender for supplementary cattle feed demonstrates good basic structure but suffers from significant lack of detail regarding technical specifications and contract duration, which could hinder fair competition and clarity for bidders.

Poängfördelning

Regelefterlevnad100/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by specifying mandatory exclusion grounds and using the ESPD. However, the ambiguity regarding evaluation criteria could pose a procedural risk if not clarified.

•Ambiguity between 'evaluation criteria and indicators in the table' and 'total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion' needs clarification to ensure legal compliance of the evaluation process.
Tydlighet100/100

While the overall subject and submission process are clear, the tender critically lacks specific technical details for the supplementary feed, making it challenging for bidders to formulate precise offers. The evaluation criteria also present an internal inconsistency.

•Lack of detailed technical specifications for the supplementary feed (e.g., nutritional content, specific ingredients, packaging, quality standards).
•Contradiction between the description mentioning 'evaluation criteria and indicators in the table' and the explicit statement that 'total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion'.
Fullständighet91/100

Basic tender information is complete, but crucial details such as contract duration and comprehensive technical specifications for the goods are missing. Specific qualification requirements are also not detailed in the provided extract.

•Missing explicit contract duration.
•Absence of detailed technical specifications for the supplementary feed.
Rättvisa80/100

The price-only evaluation criterion is generally fair for standardized goods. However, the significant lack of detailed technical specifications could inadvertently favor incumbent suppliers or those with prior knowledge, potentially limiting fair competition.

•Potential for limited competition due to the absence of detailed technical specifications, which may disadvantage new or less informed bidders.
Praktisk genomförbarhet60/100

Electronic submission and ESPD use are practical. The statement that quantities are estimated and may change requires careful management in the contract to ensure practicality and avoid disputes.

Datakonsistens100/100

A notable inconsistency exists between the general description of evaluation criteria/indicators and the explicit statement of price being the sole evaluation criterion.

•Inconsistency regarding the nature and number of evaluation criteria.
Hållbarhet0/100

The tender does not incorporate any green, social, or innovation criteria, representing a missed opportunity to promote broader public value and sustainable procurement practices.

•Absence of green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social criteria.

Styrkor

Clear basic tender information (title, reference, organization, estimated value, CPV code).
Utilizes electronic submission and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for efficiency.
Price-only evaluation criterion is straightforward for bidders (assuming clear specifications).
Subject matter is clearly identified at a high level (supplementary feed for cattle).

Potentiella problem

Significant lack of detailed technical specifications for the supplementary feed.
Ambiguity and inconsistency regarding the stated evaluation criteria.
Missing explicit contract duration, which is crucial for bidders.
Absence of green, social, or innovation criteria.
Potential for limited competition due to insufficient detail in requirements.

Rekommendationer

1. Provide comprehensive and detailed technical specifications for the supplementary feed, including quality parameters, nutritional content, packaging, and delivery terms.
2. Clarify the evaluation criteria to resolve the inconsistency, explicitly stating whether 'indicators in the table' are technical specifications for compliance or actual evaluation criteria.
3. Specify the contract duration and, if quantities are estimated, provide a clear range of potential variation.

Förhandsgranskning av AI-poäng

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Fullständig analys av kvalitetsbetyg
Detaljerad uppdelning av delpoäng
Insikter om styrkor och svagheter
Strategiska rekommendationer

Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter