Wren Academy Finchley Städning Anbud 2026-2029

This tender for cleaning services at Wren Academy Finchley is generally well-structured, with clear scope and financial information, although some practical submission aspects and specific sustainability criteria are less defined.

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. No explicit disputes or regulatory non-compliance are indicated in the provided data. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of a restricted procedure.

The description of services required is comprehensive, detailing daily, periodic, and specific cleaning tasks. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are clearly outlined, though evaluation criteria are notably absent.

Most essential information is present, including the contracting authority, title, reference, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of content in attached documents and the absence of specific details regarding evaluation criteria reduce completeness.

The tender appears fair, with a disclosed estimated value and an objective CPV code. The procedure is competitive. No obvious tailoring to specific companies is apparent. Access to full documentation, however, is limited by the lack of content in available documents.

The submission deadline is provided, and the contract start date aligns with it, indicating logical sequencing. However, the absence of information on e-submission and the unclear availability of financing details limit practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The 'active' status aligns with the provided timeline.

While the tender mentions 'environmentally responsible cleaning practices,' there are no explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The funding source is not specified as EU, limiting this score.