Behöver du hjälp av en upphandlingsexpert? Se vår tjänst för anbudsförberedelse
Upphandlingar

Stödboende för vuxna - Avtal om upphandlade tjänster (PSA) Fas 12

Öppen
Sista anbudsdag
15 dagar kvar
4 september 2026
Avtalsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referens
020078-2026
Värde
£225,000,000
Plats
Southern Scotland, Storbritannien
Publicerad
13 augusti 2026
CPV-kod
Tidsplan för projektet

Upphandling publicerad

5 mars 2026

Sista dag för frågor

28 augusti 2026

Sista anbudsdag

4 september 2026

Budget
£225,000,000
Varaktighet
180 månader
Plats
Southern Scotland
Typ
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetspoäng/100
Bra

Ursprunglig beskrivning av upphandling

The Council has an on-going requirement to procure Adult Supported Living Services. The Services will support vulnerable adults to live in their own homes and to play an active part in their communities as much as they are able. The Self-Directed Support (SDS) regulations offer Supported Persons a choice of provider to an extent not available through a Framework or a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) therefore the Council is utilising an innovative Procured Service Arrangement (PSA) under the Light Touch Rules contained in Regulations 74 – 76 of the Public Contract (Scotland) Regulations 2015. The PSA will allow providers to be added over its 15 year term, this will facilitate Supported Person's choice.

Riskanalys

Riskanalys är ännu inte tillgänglig för detta lands upphandlingar. För närvarande stöds: Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannien, Danmark, Nederländerna, Norge och Finland.

Vinnande strategi

Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.

Logga in

Konkurrenter

Uppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.

Logga in

Krav och kvalifikationer

5 krav inom 5 kategorier

Inlämning (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Regelefterlevnad (1)
Teknisk (1)
Ekonomisk (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Förhandsgranskning av krav

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Dokument

3 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar

OCDS RecordDOC
020078-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
020078-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.

Official PDF VersionPDF
020078-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.

Förhandsgranskning av dokument

Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser

75
Bra

Upphandlingskvalitetspoäng

This tender for Adult Supported Living Services is generally well-structured with a clear description and substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the availability of tender documents is a concern.

Poängfördelning

Regelefterlevnad75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a relevant CPV code. The use of Light Touch Rules suggests a regulatory framework is being followed. Deadlines are provided, though their adequacy for a 15-year contract is not explicitly assessed here. No disputes are noted.

Tydlighet80/100

The description of the service requirement is clear, outlining the support for vulnerable adults. The rationale for using a Procured Service Arrangement (PSA) under Light Touch Rules is explained. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
No specific submission requirements listed
Fullständighet70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of explicit details on eligibility, technical, and financial requirements mean crucial information is missing.

No document content available
Missing eligibility requirements
Rättvisa85/100

The tender utilizes an 'Open procedure' and mentions 'E-Procurement', which are positive indicators for fairness. The PSA model is described as facilitating 'Supported Person's choice', suggesting a focus on user needs. The lack of specific tailored requirements for particular companies is a strength. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk genomförbarhet65/100

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement', which is a positive aspect. However, the AI-extracted requirements suggest a lack of explicit information regarding e-submission processes, document URLs, contract start dates, and financing details, which are crucial for practical application.

No e-submission details provided
Missing contract start date
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Hållbarhet50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common sustainability considerations in modern procurement. The description focuses solely on the service provision.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Styrkor

Clear service description and objective
Significant estimated value and long contract duration
Use of E-Procurement
Open procedure for broad participation

Potentiella problem

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Missing detailed submission, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Limited information on sustainability aspects

Rekommendationer

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documentation with clear instructions for submission and required qualifications.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability objectives into the tender requirements.

Förhandsgranskning av AI-poäng

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Fullständig analys av kvalitetsbetyg
Detaljerad uppdelning av delpoäng
Insikter om styrkor och svagheter
Strategiska rekommendationer

Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter

Lägg till i pipeline