Vill du lämna anbud på offentliga upphandlingar? Se vår TaaS-tjänst för anbudsförberedelse
Upphandlingar

BHCC - RS - LPS Program - Konsultfas 1 - Designteam

Öppen
Sista anbudsdag
6 dagar kvar
juli 30, 2026
Avtalsdetaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Referens
006866-2026
Värde
£8,000,000
Plats
South East England, Storbritannien
Publicerad
juli 17, 2026
CPV-kod
Tidsplan för projektet

Upphandling publicerad

Januari 26, 2026

Sista dag för frågor

juli 23, 2026

Sista anbudsdag

juli 30, 2026

Avtalets startdatum

juli 30, 2026

KöparinsikterPRO
🔒
Lås upp köparinsikter
Se utgiftsmönster, föredragna procedurer och mer.
Uppgradera till Professional →
Budget
£8,000,000
Varaktighet
61 månader
Plats
South East England
Typ
Restricted Procedure
56
Kvalitetspoäng/100
Godkänd

Ursprunglig beskrivning av upphandling

Context and Background can be found on the linked preliminary market engagement notices. Following these notices the council have developed an approach to appointing the design team across two sites which cover a combined 7 of the 8 blocks. The block retained outside of this arrangement (St. James House in Kemptown) is being progressed through an existing contractual mechanism within the council. The remaining blocks are being separated into two sites under which each site will have a separate design team appointed, these will be: The Hollingdean Site: Comprised of 2 blocks; Nettleton Court and Dudeney Lodge. The Whitehawk Site: Comprised of 5 blocks; Kingfisher Court, Falcon Court, Kestrel Court, Heron Court and Swallow Court. The scope of the appointments will vary slightly dependant on specialism however the intent is that the appointed consultants will progress as a minimum the redevelopment designs to RIBA stage 3 (excluding demolition). The council may appoint further stages under this contract but is still exploring the avenues for the build phase of the redevelopments which may be directly delivered by the council or handed over to a commercial development partner. In either build phase scenario these appointments will ensure that those projects can progress swiftly with the designs for the redevelopment already underway. Demolition design will be appointed through a separate process but is being made under the same rationale; to bring forward the pre-build phase work to compress the total redevelopment timeline. This tender will be undertaken in two stages: Stage 1; Shortlisting (Conditions of participation and Quality) Stage 2; Invitation to tender (Quality and price) The Lot structure will be based on a Lot for each specialism for each site, Hollingdean (Site 1; Lot 1; Each Specialism A, B, C and D), Whitehawk (Site 2; Lot 2; Each Specialism A, B, C and D). This makes for a total of eight available lots. The specialist areas for appointment in Phase 1 are as follows: - A: Employers Agent / Quantity Surveyor / Project Manager (CDM) - B: Architect (Building safety and Principal designer) - C: Structural and Civil Engineering - D: Fire safety engineer Bidders will be able to bid for all lots but can only be appointed in limited combinations to improve resilience across the sites and ensure that conflict of interest can be managed by the client team and the Lead Consultant. The highest scoring bidder for each lot will be appointed with a ranking system used to determine the winner, in the case of a single bidder being successful in more lots or combinations which are not allowed they will be appointed based on their highest scoring responses and excluded from those beyond the maximum appointments possible. Bidders can be awarded for combination of only lots A for both sites or Lots B, C & D for each site with a maximum number of appointments over all lots of 3 appointments per supplier. Stage 1 will shortlist to a maximum of 5 bidders per lot and stage 2 will award a single bidder to each Lot. The programme for this project has several complex risk factors related to the existing residents, demolition and the councils build phase delivery model. However it is the council's intent to complete the redevelopment in the fastest realistic timescale and has therefore left this contract with a 5 years initial term allowing for a long extension to cover some appointments potentially remaining client side during the build phase. The process describes this appointment as phase 1, this is due to the need for at least one further phases of appointments of consultants. Phase 2 appointments will consist of the team appointed to design and potentially deliver demolition of the two sites.

Riskanalys

Riskanalys är ännu inte tillgänglig för detta lands upphandlingar. För närvarande stöds: Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannien, Danmark, Nederländerna, Norge och Finland.

Vinnande strategi

Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.

Logga in

Konkurrenter

Uppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.

Logga in

Krav och kvalifikationer

22 krav inom 5 kategorier

Inlämning (8)
Obligatorisk (1)
Regelefterlevnad (6)
Teknisk (5)
Ekonomisk (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Participate in a two-stage restricted procurement process.
--Submit a Stage 1 application for shortlisting, addressing "Conditions of participation and Quality".
--If shortlisted (maximum 5 bidders per lot), submit a Stage 2 Invitation to Tender, addressing "Quality and price".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--(No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are stated in the provided text.)
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be capable of providing Architectural, construction, engineering, and inspection services (CPV 71000000).
--Must be able to provide services for at least one of the specified specialisms: Employers Agent / Quantity Surveyor / Project Manager (CDM), Architect (Building safety and Principal designer), Structural and Civil Engineering, or Fire safety engineer.
--Must be able to progress redevelopment designs to RIBA stage 3 (excluding demolition).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate capability to deliver redevelopment designs to RIBA stage 3 (excluding demolition).
--Demonstrate expertise in the chosen specialism(s): Employers Agent / Quantity Surveyor / Project Manager (CDM), Architect (Building safety and Principal designer), Structural and Civil Engineering, or Fire safety engineer.
--Demonstrate ability to work within a project aiming for the fastest realistic timescale.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Must submit a price proposal as part of the Stage 2 Invitation to Tender.
--(No explicit financial capacity requirements such as minimum turnover or financial ratios are stated in the provided text.)

Förhandsgranskning av krav

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Dokument

3 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar

OCDS RecordDOC
006866-2026_ocds_record.json

Brighton and Hove City Council is seeking design teams for two multi-block redevelopment sites, covering architectural, engineering, and project management services across eight specialist lots, with a two-stage restricted procurement process and specific limits on lot appointments.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
006866-2026_ocds_release.json

Brighton and Hove City Council seeks design teams for two housing redevelopment sites, offering 8 lots across various specialisms (Employers Agent/QS/PM, Architect, Structural/Civil, Fire Safety Engineer) through a two-stage restricted tender process with a 5-year initial contract term.

Official PDF VersionPDF
006866-2026_official.pdf

This document provides specific details for Lot 1D (Hollingdean Fire Engineer) and Lot 2A (Whitehawk Employers Agent), including estimated values, contract dates, and extension options, serving as general information about these tender components.

Förhandsgranskning av dokument

Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser

56
Godkänd

Upphandlingskvalitetspoäng

This tender is well-structured in its project description and lot breakdown, but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, tender reveal date, and an illogical contract start date, significantly impacting its legal compliance, fairness, and practicality.

Poängfördelning

Regelefterlevnad55/100

The absence of a tender reveal date and, more critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues. While the procedure type and CPV code are appropriate, these omissions undermine transparency and legal soundness.

Missing tender reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Tydlighet70/100

The project description, lot structure, and specialisms are clearly articulated. However, the critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fullständighet65/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadline, and duration, is provided. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria is a major gap in the tender's completeness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Rättvisa45/100

The absence of evaluation criteria is a fundamental fairness issue, preventing objective assessment. The missing tender reveal date and lack of e-submission also hinder equal access and preparation time. The complex and restrictive lot combination rules, while intended for risk management, could inadvertently limit competition.

No evaluation criteria specified
Missing tender reveal date
Praktisk genomförbarhet55/100

The lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant practical drawback. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and practically unfeasible, indicating a procedural flaw.

No e-submission
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Datakonsistens50/100

The most significant inconsistency is the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty, though this is a minor issue.

Contract start date is identical to submission deadline
Liable Person field is empty
Hållbarhet35/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is a missed opportunity for a project of this scale and nature.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrkor

Detailed project description and scope
Clear lot structure and specialisms
Estimated value disclosed
Documents available and summarized
Two-stage restricted procedure clearly outlined

Potentiella problem

Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Missing tender reveal date
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Absence of explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria

Rekommendationer

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria and their weightings immediately to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Clarify and correct the contract start date to reflect a realistic timeline for award and commencement.
3. Implement an e-submission platform to enhance accessibility and efficiency for bidders.

Förhandsgranskning av AI-poäng

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Fullständig analys av kvalitetsbetyg
Detaljerad uppdelning av delpoäng
Insikter om styrkor och svagheter
Strategiska rekommendationer

Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter

Lägg till i pipeline