Riskanalys är ännu inte tillgänglig för detta lands upphandlingar. För närvarande stöds: Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannien, Danmark, Nederländerna, Norge och Finland.
Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.
Logga inUppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.
Logga in23 krav inom 5 kategorier
Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser
3 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar
This OCDS data document provides structured information regarding Cheshire East Council's planned procurement notice for a construction-related professional services framework.
This OCDS data package provides standardized, machine-readable information about Cheshire East Council's framework tender for construction-related professional services, intended for informational purposes rather than submission by bidders.
Cheshire East Council is establishing a multi-lot framework for construction-related professional services, including architectural, engineering, and surveying, with an estimated value of £3.27 million, open to various public sector beneficiaries.
Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser
Overall, the tender documentation is clear and detailed in its description, but it suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and an illogical contract start date, impacting fairness and practicality.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and no disputes are noted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue, as is the lack of procedure codes.
The framework's description, objectives, and requirements are clearly articulated. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes overall clarity for potential bidders.
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and essential documents are available. Nevertheless, the fundamental lack of specified evaluation criteria represents a major gap in completeness.
While requirements appear generic and not tailored, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access.
The tender lacks electronic submission capabilities, which is a significant practical drawback. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is highly impractical and illogical, indicating a procedural flaw.
There are minor inconsistencies such as missing procedure codes and a slight discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and GBP. Critically, the contract start date is illogical as it matches the submission deadline.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices.
Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser
Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter
Hej! Jag är din AI-assistent för denna upphandling. Jag kan hjälpa dig att förstå krav, deadlines, behörighetskriterier och ge strategiska insikter.
Inget kreditkort krävs