Korekcija detaljnog plana (TPD reg. br. T00028248) teritorije koja se nalazi u ulici Vilties, grad Kelme

This tender for the correction of a detailed territorial plan in Kelmė presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, a clear understanding of local planning nuances, and a commitment to green procurement principles, despite the absence of explicit evaluation criteria.

Expertise in tailored territorial planning for sustainable urban development.

Proven ability to deliver high-quality planning solutions within regulatory frameworks.

Commitment to environmental stewardship and green procurement.

Provide a detailed, step-by-step methodology for the plan correction, emphasizing efficiency, accuracy, and adherence to Lithuanian planning laws. Showcase relevant past projects and the expertise of the proposed team.

Clearly articulate how green procurement principles will be embedded throughout the planning process and reflected in the final territorial plan. This could include sustainable material considerations, energy efficiency, biodiversity, and climate resilience.

Demonstrate a thorough understanding of Kelmė town's current territorial plan, its strengths, weaknesses, and the specific reasons for its correction. Reference local geographical, environmental, and socio-economic factors.

Ensure the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, as it is a primary submission requirement. Pay close attention to all sections, even if specific requirements are not listed.

Given the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, develop a strong value proposition that highlights technical excellence, understanding of local needs, and a robust approach to green procurement. Frame the bid as the most beneficial solution for the contracting authority.

Dedicate a significant section to detailing how green procurement principles will be integrated into the territorial plan correction. Provide concrete examples and measurable outcomes related to sustainability.

Proactively contact the contracting authority to seek clarification on the specific aspects of the detailed territorial plan that require correction. This will ensure a precise and targeted proposal.

Outline a clear and efficient project management approach, including timelines, resource allocation, and quality control mechanisms, to demonstrate capacity for delivering the 11-month contract successfully.

Include a strategy for engaging with local stakeholders, demonstrating a commitment to inclusive planning and ensuring the revised plan reflects community needs and aspirations.

This tender for detailed plan correction in Kelmė is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing and sustainability aspects.

The tender follows an open procedure compliant with EU directives. CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are noted, the absence of a reveal date and explicit evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern.

The tender title and description are clear, and essential documents like the contract notice and tender conditions are provided. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the financing information is missing, impacting overall completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, and essential documents are accessible. The lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no explicit indications of tailored requirements for specific companies.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the financing information is absent, hindering practical planning for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender status is active.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documentation. It is also not indicated as EU funded.