Meridian Community Primary _ Usluge čišćenja

This tender for cleaning services at Meridian Community Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with standard public procurement procedures, including the use of a CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity of preparing a bid. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is implied through the mention of COSHH, health and safety, and environmental requirements.

The description of the cleaning services required is detailed and comprehensive, outlining daily, weekly, periodic, and deep cleaning tasks. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are clearly extracted and understandable. The scope of work is well-defined.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, and crucial information regarding evaluation criteria is missing, which significantly impacts completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements are objective and focus on the service delivery rather than specific company capabilities, promoting a fair competition. The use of an open procedure is standard. However, the lack of accessible tender documents and clear evaluation criteria could be perceived as a slight disadvantage.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the URL for accessing tender documents is not provided, which hinders the practical aspects of the submission process. Financing information is also absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The contract start date and submission deadline are logically ordered. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement initiatives, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.