Sistem kvalifikacije – Nabavka kablova za N1 A/S

This tender establishes a qualification system for cable suppliers. While generally well-structured with clear product categories and an open procedure, it lacks specific financial details and evaluation criteria, and the submission deadline is unusually distant.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. The submission deadline is exceptionally far in the future (2055), which is unusual and could be a data entry error or indicate a very long-term qualification system. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the qualification system and the types of cables covered is clear. The purpose and process of qualification are well-explained. However, specific evaluation criteria for qualification are missing, which impacts clarity on how suppliers will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The types of goods are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not mentioned. The availability of tender documents is indicated, but their content is not accessible in this summary.

The procedure is an open one, and the qualification system aims to create a list of capable suppliers. The criteria for qualification are based on the ability to supply specific cable types. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is noted. However, the reservation of the right to limit the number of invited suppliers could be perceived as less transparent if not managed with clear objective criteria.

The tender mentions 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, suggesting electronic submission. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which is contradictory. The contract start date and financing information are not provided. The distant submission deadline also impacts practicality.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The status is 'active'. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (publication date and submission deadline) are logically present, although the submission deadline is unusually far in the future.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information. This category is therefore not addressed.