Skip to main content
Želite da licitirate na javnim nabavkama? Pogledajte našu uslugu pripreme tendera TaaS
Tenderi

Renoviranje parka za igru Rhodes Minnis

Otvoreno
Rok
ostalo 62 dana
Jun 06, 2026
Detalji ugovora
Kategorija
Open Procedure
Referenca
028386-2026
Vrednost
£72,000
Lokacija
United Kingdom, Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo
Objavljeno
Mart 28, 2026
Organizacija
CPV šifra
Vremenski okvir projekta

Objavljen tender

Mart 27, 2026

Rok za pitanja

Maj 30, 2026

Rok za podnošenje ponuda

Jun 06, 2026

Datum početka ugovora

Avgust 02, 2026

Budžet
£72,000
Trajanje
1 meseci
Lokacija
United Kingdom
Tip
Open Procedure
75
Rezultat kvaliteta/100
Dobro

Originalni opis tendera

Renoviranje parka za igru kako bi se uključila inkluzivnija i pristupačnija oprema.

Analiza rizika

Analiza rizika još uvek nije dostupna za tendere u ovoj zemlji. Trenutno podržano: Estonija, Poljska, Litvanija i Letonija.

Strategija za pobedu

Dobijte AI strategiju za pobedu prilagođenu ovom tenderu. Uključuje ocenu verovatnoće pobede, ključne prilike i izazove, preporučene oblasti fokusa za ponudu, uvide u konkurentsko pozicioniranje i konkretne preporuke za maksimiziranje vaših šansi.

Prijavite se

Konkurenti

Nadogradite da biste videli koje kompanije će se verovatno nadmetati na ovom tenderu, na osnovu istorijskih podataka o javnim nabavkama.

Prijavite se

Zahtevi i kvalifikacije

AI izdvaja i organizuje sve zahteve iz tenderskih dokumenata — obavezne kvalifikacije, tehničke specifikacije, finansijske uslove i pravila za podnošenje — jasno kategorizovane kako biste znali tačno šta je potrebno za podnošenje ponude.

Prijavite se

Dokumenti

Dobijte AI-generisane sažetke svih tenderskih dokumenata. Brzo razumejte šta svaki dokument sadrži bez čitanja stotina stranica — uključujući obim, uslove, kriterijume evaluacije i ključne obaveze.

Prijavite se
75
Dobro

Rezultat kvaliteta tendera

This tender for playground refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting clarity and completeness.

Pregled rezultata

Zakonska usklađenost75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. The procedure is stated as 'Open procedure'. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission that could lead to procedural challenges.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Jasnoća80/100

The description of the work is clear, focusing on inclusive and accessible equipment. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed. However, the lack of document content and specific evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of the detailed requirements.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria specified
Potpunost70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. The main deficiency is the lack of accessible tender documents with content, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Pravičnost85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for exclusion and capability are listed. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be a concern, but there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

Praktičnost65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits its practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is also not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission specified
Document URL not provided
Konzistentnost podataka90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission and contract start are consistent with the contract duration.

Održivost50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Prednosti

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value disclosed
Open procedure indicated
Basic description provided

Nedostaci

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission specified
Lack of sustainability focus

Preporuke

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide access to tender documents with detailed content.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects.

Pregled AI ocene

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Potpuna analiza ocene kvaliteta
Detaljan pregled pod-ocena
Uvidi u prednosti i zabrinutosti
Strateške preporuke

Nije potrebna kreditna kartica • Podešavanje za 2 minuta

Nova usluga

Želite da prepustite nama ovaj tender?

Naši stručnjaci za javne nabavke pripremaju sve. Dokazano efikasno — Vi pregledate, odobrite i predate.

~1hVaše vreme
80%+80%+
$0Unapred
Pogledajte punu uporednu analizu
Bez TaaS-aSa TaaS-om
40-80 sati
Vreme pripreme
~1 sat
Vaše vreme
15-25%
Prosečan procenat uspešnosti
80%+
Procenat uspešnosti
Rizik od grešaka
Ručna provera
Stručna kontrola kvaliteta
Provera usaglašenosti
Sve radite Vi
Kompletna obrada
Sve radimo mi
Kompletna usluga
Dobijmo ovaj tender
Platite samo kada pobedite · Preko 400 kompanija nam veruje
Ili uradite sami

Dodaj u plan