TD2331 - Usluga porodične podrške zajednici za pomoć porodicama i mladima koji napuštaju sistem starateljstva, a koji mogu imati višestruke ili složene potrebe

This tender for family-based community support services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a defined budget. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open competition below the threshold. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, which is a regulatory expectation.

The description of the service is clear, outlining the target beneficiaries, objectives, and methodology (strengths-based). Requirements are documented, but the absence of specific submission and evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed submission requirements and the absence of content for the attached tender documents limit its completeness.

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. The process is not explicitly stated as e-procurement, which could be a minor concern depending on local regulations.

The contract start date is specified, and financing information (budget) is provided. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document content reduce practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are consistent with the contract duration.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects beyond the service itself, or innovation as a specific evaluation criterion, although 'innovative' is mentioned in the description. It is not indicated as EU funded.