Nameštaj za novu bolnicu Nordsjælland

This tender for furniture for a new hospital is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an active status. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. No disputes are reported. The procedure type is listed as 'competition' but the specific procedure code is missing, which is a minor oversight.

The description clearly states the subject of the procurement and the contracting authority. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical capability requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline. However, crucial details such as contract duration, specific eligibility and technical requirements, and financing information are missing. The availability of documents is indicated, but their content is not directly accessible within the provided information.

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement is indicated. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of detailed requirements could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may struggle to understand the precise expectations.

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practical submission. However, the absence of a direct URL for document content and the lack of specified contract start date and duration limit the practical assessment. The submission deadline is provided, but its feasibility is questionable without further context.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the notice publication preceding the submission deadline.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.