Rušenje Henson Vila

This tender for demolition work is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. The absence of disputes and suspensions contributes positively. The deadline is within a reasonable timeframe for a below-threshold tender.

The description of the demolition site and the nature of the work is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the unavailability of document content significantly reduce completeness.

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern. There is no indication of tailored requirements for specific companies.

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.