Skip to main content
Želite da licitirate na javnim nabavkama? Pogledajte našu uslugu pripreme tendera TaaS
Tenderi

Izrada projektne dokumentacije, stručni nadzor, izvođenje građevinskih radova za „Rekonstrukciju parkinga u ulici Tartu, parcela sa katastarskim brojem 05000080416, Daugavpils“

Otvoreno
Rok
ostalo 25 dana
April 29, 2026
Detalji ugovora
Kategorija
Građevinarstvo
Referenca
167507
Vrednost
Nije otkriveno
Lokacija
Latgale, Letonija
Objavljeno
Mart 29, 2026
CPV šifra
Vremenski okvir projekta

Objavljen tender

Mart 29, 2026

Rok za pitanja

April 22, 2026

Rok za podnošenje ponuda

April 29, 2026

Otvaranje ponuda

April 29, 2026

Verovatnoća pobedePRO
🔒
Nadogradite na Professional
Pogledajte svoju procenjenu verovatnoću pobede na osnovu istorijskih podataka.
Nadogradite na Profesionalni paket →
Uvid u sektorPRO
🔒
Otključajte uvide u sektor
Pogledajte prosečne pobedničke cene, nivoe konkurencije i tržišne trendove.
Nadogradite na Profesionalni paket →
Budžet
Nije otkriveno
Trajanje
8 meseci
Lokacija
Latgale
Tip
Građevinarstvo
75
Rezultat kvaliteta/100
Dobro
Uporedna analiza tržišta
Prosečna pobednička cena
€491,981
Prosečan broj ponuda
3.0
Konkurencija
Niska
Pobednici iz redova MSP
99%
20,606 analiziranih tendera

Originalni opis tendera

Izrada projektne dokumentacije, stručni nadzor, izvođenje građevinskih radova za „Rekonstrukciju parkinga u ulici Tartu, parcela sa katastarskim brojem 05000080416, Daugavpils“

Pokreni analizu rizika

Identifikujte potencijalne rizike, neusklađenosti i upozorenja u svim tenderskim dokumentima. Dobijte detaljan izveštaj o rizicima sa nivoima ozbiljnosti i preporukama za ublažavanje.

Prijavite se

Strategija za pobedu

AI analiza zahteva, prilika i izazova ovog tendera. Dobijte strateške uvide za povećanje verovatnoće pobede.

65%
Procenjena verovatnoća pobedeUmereno podudaranje

This tender requires a comprehensive approach, integrating design, supervision, and construction for a parking lot reconstruction. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, cost-effectiveness, and efficient project delivery within the specified timeframe, leveraging local expertise and a clear understanding of Daugavpils' specific needs.

Ključne poruke za pobedu

Integrated Expertise: Seamless delivery from design to construction, ensuring quality and efficiency.

Local Understanding, Proven Delivery: Deep knowledge of Daugavpils' infrastructure needs and a track record of successful municipal projects.

Value-Driven Solution: Competitive pricing combined with a commitment to durable, functional, and well-managed construction.

Ključne prilike
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value.
The integrated nature of the contract (design, supervision, construction) allows for a holistic approach and potential cost efficiencies.
The relatively short duration (8 months) suggests a need for efficient project management and a well-resourced team.
The absence of explicit green or social value requirements allows focus on core technical and cost aspects, but can be a differentiator if strategically incorporated.
Ključni izazovi
Unspecified evaluation criteria make it difficult to tailor the bid precisely to the authority's priorities.

Conduct thorough due diligence to understand the contracting authority's likely priorities (e.g., cost, quality, speed, local impact). Proactively propose a clear and logical evaluation framework in the bid, emphasizing the bidder's strengths.

Lack of disclosed estimated value makes cost benchmarking difficult.

Research similar past projects in Daugavpils or Latvia to establish a realistic cost range. Focus on providing a highly competitive and well-justified price, demonstrating value for money.

Potential for high competition due to the integrated nature of the contract, attracting firms with broad capabilities.

Clearly articulate unique selling propositions, such as specialized local knowledge, innovative construction methods (even if not explicitly required), or superior project management methodologies.

Profil idealnog ponuđača
A Latvian-based construction company with a proven track record in municipal infrastructure projects, specifically parking lot development or reconstruction. The ideal bidder possesses in-house design capabilities or strong partnerships with local design firms, a skilled workforce, and a history of successful project completion within budget and schedule. Experience with Daugavpils municipality projects would be a significant advantage.
Ključni zahtevi
Development of construction design documentation
Author supervision
Construction works for parking lot reconstruction
Adherence to mandatory exclusion grounds
Meeting eligibility requirements
Meeting technical capability requirements
Meeting financial requirements
Adherence to submission requirements
Ključni diskriminatori
Demonstrated experience in Daugavpils or similar Latvian urban environments.
A highly integrated project management approach that minimizes handovers and potential delays.
A proactive approach to risk management, clearly outlining potential issues and mitigation strategies.
A commitment to high-quality materials and construction techniques that ensure long-term durability of the parking lot.
Prilike za društvenu vrednost
Commit to employing local labor for a significant portion of the construction works, contributing to the Daugavpils economy.
Implement a waste reduction and recycling plan during construction, even if not mandated.
Fokusne oblasti ponude
Technical Proposal (Design, Supervision, Construction)

Provide detailed, clear, and technically sound proposals for each phase. Emphasize the synergy between design and construction. Showcase relevant past projects with photographic evidence and client testimonials. For design, highlight practical, durable, and user-friendly solutions. For construction, detail efficient methodologies and quality control processes. For author supervision, emphasize proactive monitoring and problem-solving.

Price/Cost

Develop a highly competitive and transparent pricing structure. Clearly itemize costs and provide justification for key expenditures. Highlight cost-saving measures implemented without compromising quality. Consider offering value-added services or a slightly extended warranty as part of a competitive package.

Project Management and Schedule

Present a detailed, realistic, and achievable project schedule. Outline a robust project management plan, including communication protocols, stakeholder engagement, and risk management. Demonstrate the capacity to deliver within the 8-month timeframe.

Preporuke7
Thoroughly Analyze All Tender Documents
KritičnoVeliki napor

Despite AI extraction, meticulously review 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for all explicit and implicit requirements, especially regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial criteria. Pay close attention to any appendices or referenced documents.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification.
Proactively Define Evaluation Criteria
KritičnoSrednji napor

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, develop a proposed evaluation framework within the bid that aligns with the likely priorities of a municipal authority (e.g., technical merit, cost-effectiveness, project timeline adherence, local benefit). Clearly articulate how your bid excels in these areas.

Guides the evaluator and highlights bidder strengths.
Highlight Integrated Project Delivery Capability
VisokoSrednji napor

Emphasize the advantage of offering design, supervision, and construction under one roof. This reduces coordination risks, streamlines communication, and can lead to faster, more efficient project completion. Showcase past projects where this integrated approach was successful.

Positions the bidder as a one-stop solution, reducing perceived risk for the client.
Conduct Local Market Research for Pricing
VisokoSrednji napor

Given the undisclosed estimated value, research recent municipal infrastructure projects in Daugavpils and surrounding regions to establish a competitive pricing benchmark. Ensure the price is realistic, profitable, and perceived as good value.

Ensures a competitive and viable bid price.
Develop a Comprehensive Risk Management Plan
VisokoSrednji napor

Proactively identify potential risks associated with parking lot reconstruction (e.g., unforeseen ground conditions, utility conflicts, weather delays) and detail robust mitigation strategies. This demonstrates foresight and preparedness.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to manage the project successfully.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
SrednjeMali napor

Even though social value is not explicitly required, commit to employing local labor for a significant percentage of the workforce. This aligns with municipal goals and can be a subtle differentiator.

Enhances community relations and potentially improves local perception.
Showcase Relevant Local Experience
SrednjeSrednji napor

If the bidder has prior experience with Daugavpils municipality or similar projects in Latvia, highlight this prominently. Demonstrate familiarity with local regulations, standards, and community needs.

Builds credibility and trust with the contracting authority.
Konkurentsko pozicioniranje
Position the bid as the most reliable and efficient solution by emphasizing integrated service delivery and a proven track record in similar projects. Highlight a deep understanding of Daugavpils' specific context and a commitment to delivering a high-quality, durable parking facility that meets the community's needs. Focus on demonstrating superior project management and a proactive approach to problem-solving, ensuring minimal disruption and timely completion.

Konkurenti

Nadogradite da biste videli koje kompanije će se verovatno nadmetati na ovom tenderu, na osnovu istorijskih podataka o javnim nabavkama.

Prijavite se

Zahtevi i kvalifikacije

7 zahteva u 5 kategorija

Predaja (1)
Obavezno (1)
Usklađenost (1)
Tehnički (3)
Finansijski (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not available in provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Information not available in provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not available in provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Development of construction design documentation
--Author supervision
--Construction works for parking lot reconstruction
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not available in provided text]

Pregled zahteva

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Dokumenti

3 dokumenata dostupno sa AI sažecima

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167507_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329112154.pdf -- 96.0 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the reconstruction of a parking lot on Tartu Street in Daugavpils, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
20260217 TS Tartu iela, stavlaukums.edoc.bin -- 2.6 MB

This document contains a technical specification for the development of construction design documentation, author supervision, and construction work for the reconstruction of a parking lot on Tartu Street in Daugavpils.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main tender data for the development of construction design documentation, author supervision, and construction works for a parking lot reconstruction in Daugavpils, Latvia.

Pregled dokumenata

Registrujte se da biste videli sažetke i analizu dokumenata

75
Dobro

Rezultat kvaliteta tendera

This tender for parking lot reconstruction in Daugavpils is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria raises concerns about transparency and fairness.

Pregled rezultata

Zakonska usklađenost75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information, but the lack of explicit mention of specific regulations could be a minor point.

Jasnoća80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents (technical specification and requirements) provide detailed information. The criteria for technical capability are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria for proposals reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Potpunost70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a clear description of the works. Contract duration and tender validity are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Pravičnost85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The objective criteria for technical capability are outlined. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the 'Restricted document access' flag suggest potential limitations in full document access for all interested parties, impacting fairness.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Praktičnost65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the contract duration is provided. Financing information is not disclosed. The primary concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could hinder practical preparation of bids.

Restricted document access
Financing information not disclosed
Konzistentnost podataka90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced. No suspension or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.

Održivost50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Prednosti

Clear technical requirements
Active e-procurement process
Reasonable submission deadline
Proper CPV code provided

Nedostaci

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of sustainability criteria

Preporuke

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.

Pregled AI ocene

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Potpuna analiza ocene kvaliteta
Detaljan pregled pod-ocena
Uvidi u prednosti i zabrinutosti
Strateške preporuke

Nije potrebna kreditna kartica • Podešavanje za 2 minuta

Nova usluga

Želite da prepustite nama ovaj tender?

Naši stručnjaci za javne nabavke pripremaju sve. Dokazano efikasno — Vi pregledate, odobrite i predate.

~1hVaše vreme
80%+80%+
$0Unapred
Pogledajte punu uporednu analizu
Bez TaaS-aSa TaaS-om
40-80 sati
Vreme pripreme
~1 sat
Vaše vreme
15-25%
Prosečan procenat uspešnosti
80%+
Procenat uspešnosti
Rizik od grešaka
Ručna provera
Stručna kontrola kvaliteta
Provera usaglašenosti
Sve radite Vi
Kompletna obrada
Sve radimo mi
Kompletna usluga
Dobijmo ovaj tender
Platite samo kada pobedite · Preko 400 kompanija nam veruje
Ili uradite sami

Dodaj u plan