Imenovanje izvođača radova na održavanju po utvrđenoj ceni na određeni rok za Udruženje seoskog stanovanja

This tender for rural housing maintenance is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detail on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate for construction work. While no disputes are indicated, the absence of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond standard procurement practices and the potential for a short submission deadline (though not explicitly flagged as too short by the rules) are minor points. The lack of a reveal date is a procedural oversight.

The description of the Rural Housing Association and the scope of works (24/7 repairs, voids, aids, adaptions, compliance, planned maintenance) is clear. The requirements for technical capability are also well-defined, directly reflecting the service needs. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The description provides context. However, the critical issue is the lack of accessible document content, preventing a full assessment of all requirements and specifications. Financial requirements and specific submission requirements are also not detailed in the provided text.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability appear objective and service-related. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria.

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission, a direct document URL, and financing details limits the practicality for potential bidders. The lack of accessible document content is a significant barrier.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. The contract duration is clearly stated.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. This area is underdeveloped.