Skip to main content
Želite da licitirate na javnim nabavkama? Pogledajte našu uslugu pripreme tendera TaaS
Tenderi

Nova škola, Indre Ringvej - Tender za ukupni ugovor

Otvoreno
Rok
ostalo 9 dana
April 13, 2026
Detalji ugovora
Kategorija
Ostalo
Referenca
00170483-2026
Vrednost
Nije otkriveno
Lokacija
Syddanmark, Denmark
Objavljeno
Mart 27, 2026
CPV šifra
Vremenski okvir projekta

Objavljen tender

Mart 11, 2026

Rok za pitanja

April 06, 2026

Rok za podnošenje ponuda

April 13, 2026

Budžet
Nije otkriveno
Trajanje
Nije navedeno
Lokacija
Syddanmark
Tip
Ostalo
75
Rezultat kvaliteta/100
Dobro

Originalni opis tendera

Tender se sprovodi kao postupak sa pregovaranjem u skladu sa članovima 61-66 Zakona o javnim nabavkama sa prethodnom pretkvalifikacijom. Naručilac zadržava pravo da ne sprovede pregovore i tako dodeli ugovor na osnovu početne ponude. Kriterijum za dodelu je „Najbolji odnos cene i kvaliteta“ u skladu sa članom 162, tačka 3 Zakona o javnim nabavkama. Među kandidatima za pretkvalifikaciju biće izabrana četiri tima, koja će biti pozvana da podnesu ponude. Faza ponude počinje zajedničkim obilaskom lokacije.

Pokreni analizu rizika

Identifikujte potencijalne rizike, neusklađenosti i upozorenja u svim tenderskim dokumentima. Dobijte detaljan izveštaj o rizicima sa nivoima ozbiljnosti i preporukama za ublažavanje.

Prijavite se

Strategija za pobedu

Dobijte AI strategiju za pobedu prilagođenu ovom tenderu. Uključuje ocenu verovatnoće pobede, ključne prilike i izazove, preporučene oblasti fokusa za ponudu, uvide u konkurentsko pozicioniranje i konkretne preporuke za maksimiziranje vaših šansi.

Prijavite se

Konkurenti

Nadogradite da biste videli koje kompanije će se verovatno nadmetati na ovom tenderu, na osnovu istorijskih podataka o javnim nabavkama.

Prijavite se

Zahtevi i kvalifikacije

19 zahteva u 5 kategorija

Predaja (9)
Obavezno (1)
Usklađenost (2)
Tehnički (6)
Finansijski (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The tender is conducted as a negotiated procedure with prior pre-qualification, according to the Public Procurement Act §§ 61-66.
--The contracting authority reserves the right not to conduct negotiations and to award the contract based on the initial tender.
--The award criterion is "The best ratio between price and quality" according to the Public Procurement Act § 162, no. 3.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be selected from applicants to the pre-qualification stage.
--Four teams will be selected to submit tenders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders will be invited to a voluntary dialogue meeting to discuss the intended architectural approach of their tender.
--The dialogue meeting aims to clarify questions and provide an updated understanding of architectural frameworks and intentions.
--The contracting authority will not evaluate qualitative sub-criteria before, during, or after the dialogue meeting.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text.

Pregled zahteva

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Dokumenti

Dobijte AI-generisane sažetke svih tenderskih dokumenata. Brzo razumejte šta svaki dokument sadrži bez čitanja stotina stranica — uključujući obim, uslove, kriterijume evaluacije i ključne obaveze.

Prijavite se
75
Dobro

Rezultat kvaliteta tendera

This tender is a well-structured open procedure with pre-qualification, focusing on price-quality ratio. Key information is present, but financial details and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting completeness and clarity.

Pregled rezultata

Zakonska usklađenost75/100

The tender follows a recognized legal procedure (negotiated procedure with pre-qualification) and specifies the relevant legal basis. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are indicated. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some standards, but not critically so given the procedure type.

Jasnoća80/100

The description of the procedure, including the pre-qualification, negotiation phases, and the award criterion ('best ratio between price and quality'), is generally clear. However, the specific sub-criteria for evaluating 'price and quality' are not detailed, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Missing specific evaluation criteria for 'price and quality'.
Potpunost70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are available, their content is not accessible in the provided data, and contract duration is not specified.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Contract duration not specified.
Pravičnost85/100

The procedure is open, and the award criterion is objective ('best ratio between price and quality'). The use of e-procurement is noted. The selection of four teams for tender submission is a standard practice. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Praktičnost65/100

E-submission is indicated via a project website. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The availability of document content is crucial for practical submission, which is currently lacking.

Missing contract start date.
Financing information not provided.
Konzistentnost podataka90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical within the context of the tender publication and deadline.

Održivost50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided text, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social aspects.

Prednosti

Clear procedure outlined (negotiated with pre-qualification).
Objective award criterion ('price and quality').
E-procurement utilized.
Reference number and organization clearly stated.

Nedostaci

Estimated value not disclosed.
Specific evaluation sub-criteria are missing.
Content of tender documents not accessible.
Lack of sustainability considerations.

Preporuke

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Provide detailed sub-criteria for the 'price and quality' evaluation.
3. Include information on sustainability aspects if applicable.

Pregled AI ocene

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Potpuna analiza ocene kvaliteta
Detaljan pregled pod-ocena
Uvidi u prednosti i zabrinutosti
Strateške preporuke

Nije potrebna kreditna kartica • Podešavanje za 2 minuta

Nova usluga

Želite da prepustite nama ovaj tender?

Naši stručnjaci za javne nabavke pripremaju sve. Dokazano efikasno — Vi pregledate, odobrite i predate.

~1hVaše vreme
80%+80%+
$0Unapred
Pogledajte punu uporednu analizu
Bez TaaS-aSa TaaS-om
40-80 sati
Vreme pripreme
~1 sat
Vaše vreme
15-25%
Prosečan procenat uspešnosti
80%+
Procenat uspešnosti
Rizik od grešaka
Ručna provera
Stručna kontrola kvaliteta
Provera usaglašenosti
Sve radite Vi
Kompletna obrada
Sve radimo mi
Kompletna usluga
Dobijmo ovaj tender
Platite samo kada pobedite · Preko 400 kompanija nam veruje
Ili uradite sami

Dodaj u plan