Autoputevi - Istraživanje drenaže autoputa A6

This tender for a highways drainage survey is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate for survey services. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the required services (baseline survey, cleansing, risk model development) is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specific financial requirements beyond the overall tender value limit its completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The requirements are generally objective and related to the service scope. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of explicit e-submission details is a minor concern.

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of explicit e-submission instructions and the lack of information regarding financing make the practical aspects less straightforward for potential bidders. The requirement for submission in multiple languages (English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian) adds complexity.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.