Skip to main content
Želite da licitirate na javnim nabavkama? Pogledajte našu uslugu pripreme tendera TaaS
Tenderi

Ukupne savetodavne usluge za renoviranje Lærkeskolen u opštini Egedal

Otvoreno
Rok
ostalo 13 dana
April 17, 2026
Detalji ugovora
Kategorija
Ostalo
Referenca
00164624-2026
Vrednost
kr37,000,000
Lokacija
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Objavljeno
Mart 27, 2026
Organizacija
CPV šifra
Vremenski okvir projekta

Objavljen tender

Mart 10, 2026

Rok za pitanja

April 10, 2026

Rok za podnošenje ponuda

April 17, 2026

Budžet
kr37,000,000
Trajanje
Nije navedeno
Lokacija
Hovedstaden
Tip
Ostalo
75
Rezultat kvaliteta/100
Dobro

Originalni opis tendera

Ovi uslovi tendera odnose se na tender Opštine Egedal za sporazum o ukupnom savetovanju u vezi sa renoviranjem postojeće škole pod nazivom „Lærkeskolen“, Præstegårdsvej 30, u Stenløse. Ukupni savetnik će pomoći Opštini Egedal u sveobuhvatnom renoviranju Lærkeskolen, a Opštini Egedal su potrebne ukupne savetodavne usluge u vezi sa razjašnjavanjem, definisanjem, planiranjem, programiranjem, preliminarnim studijama, uključujući destruktivne i ekološke studije, projektovanje, tenderski postupak i savetovanje tokom izvršenja zadatka.

Pokreni analizu rizika

Identifikujte potencijalne rizike, neusklađenosti i upozorenja u svim tenderskim dokumentima. Dobijte detaljan izveštaj o rizicima sa nivoima ozbiljnosti i preporukama za ublažavanje.

Prijavite se

Strategija za pobedu

Dobijte AI strategiju za pobedu prilagođenu ovom tenderu. Uključuje ocenu verovatnoće pobede, ključne prilike i izazove, preporučene oblasti fokusa za ponudu, uvide u konkurentsko pozicioniranje i konkretne preporuke za maksimiziranje vaših šansi.

Prijavite se

Konkurenti

Nadogradite da biste videli koje kompanije će se verovatno nadmetati na ovom tenderu, na osnovu istorijskih podataka o javnim nabavkama.

Prijavite se

Zahtevi i kvalifikacije

16 zahteva u 5 kategorija

Predaja (3)
Obavezno (1)
Usklađenost (3)
Tehnički (7)
Finansijski (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Deadline for submission: 2026-04-17 10:00:00.
--The tender is an Open Procedure.
--Bidders must provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian, French, and Danish.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a Totalrådgiver (Total Advisor).
--Must be able to assist Egedal Kommune in a comprehensive renovation of Lærkeskolen.
--Must provide totalrådgivning (total advisory services) for clarification, delimitation, planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations), project design, tendering, and advisory services during execution and handover.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Ability to manage a project divided into multiple sub-tasks executed sequentially due to the school's continued operation.
--Experience in planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations).
--Experience in project design and preparation of tender materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 37,000,000 EUR.
--No specific financial thresholds or guarantees are mentioned in the provided text.

Pregled zahteva

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Dokumenti

Dobijte AI-generisane sažetke svih tenderskih dokumenata. Brzo razumejte šta svaki dokument sadrži bez čitanja stotina stranica — uključujući obim, uslove, kriterijume evaluacije i ključne obaveze.

Prijavite se
75
Dobro

Rezultat kvaliteta tendera

This tender for total advisory services for the renovation of Lærkeskolen is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and potentially practicality.

Pregled rezultata

Zakonska usklađenost75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and utilizes a standard CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the process appears regulatory compliant. No disputes are indicated. The submission deadline is relatively short given the complexity and value of the project, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

Submission deadline may be too short for the scope of work.
Jasnoća80/100

The description of the required services is detailed, outlining the phases and specific tasks expected from the total advisor. The requirements for technical capability are also clearly extracted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Potpunost70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code. The description provides a good overview of the project scope and phases. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and the specific content of the tender documents are not fully accessible or specified, impacting overall completeness.

Contract duration is not specified.
Full content of tender documents is not readily available.
Pravičnost85/100

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective and based on the project's needs. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktičnost65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date and duration, along with the absence of readily accessible full tender document content, reduces practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date is not specified.
Full tender document content is not readily available.
Konzistentnost podataka90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Održivost50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves renovation, which can have sustainability implications, these are not highlighted as specific requirements or evaluation criteria. The mention of EU funding is absent.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Prednosti

Clear project scope and phased approach outlined.
Open procedure ensures broad participation.
E-procurement utilized.
Objective technical capability requirements.

Nedostaci

Missing evaluation criteria.
Contract duration and start date not specified.
Full tender document content not readily accessible.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Preporuke

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
2. Provide details on contract duration and start date.
3. Ensure full tender documents are easily accessible to all potential bidders.

Pregled AI ocene

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Potpuna analiza ocene kvaliteta
Detaljan pregled pod-ocena
Uvidi u prednosti i zabrinutosti
Strateške preporuke

Nije potrebna kreditna kartica • Podešavanje za 2 minuta

Nova usluga

Želite da prepustite nama ovaj tender?

Naši stručnjaci za javne nabavke pripremaju sve. Dokazano efikasno — Vi pregledate, odobrite i predate.

~1hVaše vreme
80%+80%+
$0Unapred
Pogledajte punu uporednu analizu
Bez TaaS-aSa TaaS-om
40-80 sati
Vreme pripreme
~1 sat
Vaše vreme
15-25%
Prosečan procenat uspešnosti
80%+
Procenat uspešnosti
Rizik od grešaka
Ručna provera
Stručna kontrola kvaliteta
Provera usaglašenosti
Sve radite Vi
Kompletna obrada
Sve radimo mi
Kompletna usluga
Dobijmo ovaj tender
Platite samo kada pobedite · Preko 400 kompanija nam veruje
Ili uradite sami

Dodaj u plan