Eksterna intervencija vlasnika 3 (2026)

This tender is moderately well-structured, with clear objectives and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the service required is clear, outlining the objective of addressing vacant properties and the need for an experienced consultant. The AI-extracted requirements are logically derived from the description, though specific criteria are absent.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of specific evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements means crucial information for bidders is missing.

The tender is fair in its disclosure of value and the general nature of the requirements. The criteria are objective in principle, focusing on experience and capability. The lack of specific, potentially tailored, requirements for particular companies is a positive aspect.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission, document URLs, and financing details (beyond 'external sources') reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

The key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.