Приступ саветовању у школама

This tender for school counselling services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific eligibility and technical requirements, and the absence of evaluation criteria is a notable concern.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which impacts the procedural clarity.

The description of the service is clear, outlining the objective of enhancing mental health and wellbeing. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached documents (beyond the count) significantly reduces its completeness.

The tender is an open procedure with a disclosed value, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is also positive. The main concern is the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation, which could lead to perceived bias.

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a direct document URL and the lack of explicit financing information or a clear contract start date (the provided date is very late in the day) reduce its practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, although the contract start time is unusual.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.