Okrug Vale of White Horse zahteva usluge iskusnog menadžera projekta (EA - Agent poslodavca) za upravljanje njihovim projektima proširenja teretane i svlačionica sa mokrim delom u Wantage Leisure Centre, Portway, Wantage

This tender for project management services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial evaluation criteria and detailed documentation content, impacting its overall completeness and clarity for potential bidders.

The tender is for a below-threshold open competition, which is generally permissible. The CPV code is appropriate for construction management services. Deadlines are provided, and while they appear reasonable given the estimated value, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a reveal date could be a minor procedural concern.

The description of services required is clear, specifying the need for an experienced Project Manager (EA - Employers Agent) for gym extension and wet side changing facilities. Eligibility requirements are also reasonably outlined. However, the lack of detailed tender documentation content and unspecified evaluation criteria reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, duration, and deadline are present. However, the absence of detailed tender documentation content and a reveal date limits the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

The tender appears to be an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria for eligibility and technical capability are generally objective. The deadline seems reasonable for the value. The main concern is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which, if overly subjective, could impact fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and there is no explicit mention of e-submission or document URLs, which are common in modern e-procurement systems.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no flags for suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are important aspects of modern sustainable procurement.