PS127 - Šema lične asistencije

This tender for Personal Assistance Scheme services is generally well-structured with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender follows an open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information, but specific details are absent.

The description of the Personal Assistance Scheme and the required services (Specialist and non-Specialist Support Workers) is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents and the absence of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements within the provided text reduce its completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the use of an e-sourcing portal promotes accessibility. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

The tender mandates e-submission via the Delta eSourcing portal, which is practical. A contract start date and duration are provided. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of detailed technical/financial requirements within the main tender notice can hinder practical preparation for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The tender is active and has no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.