Tenders

Naprawa ubytków w nawierzchniach asfaltowo-betonowych dróg miasta Kohtla-Järve

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 23 dni
Marzec 26, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
306720
Wartość
€180,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 27, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Pothole repair of asphalt concrete pavements of Kohtla-Järve city roads100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 27, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 19, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 26, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 26, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Kwiecień 20, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€180,000
Duration
Not specified
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
75
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Naprawa ubytków w nawierzchniach asfaltowo-betonowych dróg miasta Kohtla-Järve zgodnie z opisem technicznym.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

15 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (6)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (3)
Techniczne (2)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-26 09:00:00.
--The tender is not divided into lots for reasons of expediency, as the construction works are interdependent.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors for fraud and money laundering, requiring responses regarding convictions, measures, and electronic accessibility.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not have convictions for fraud, corruption, money laundering, or other criminal offenses that could affect the integrity of the procurement process.
--Bidders must not be subject to sanctions or restrictive measures related to fraud or corruption.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally registered to operate.
--Bidders must confirm their eligibility using the provided Hankepass (preliminary self-declaration) instead of official certificates from authorities or third parties.
--For joint bidders, a power of attorney must be provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The scope of work includes milling, asphalt laying, and crack repair on roads.
--Bidders must be capable of performing asphalt concrete surface repair works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 180,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit their price offer using the provided "Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx" (Price Offer Form).

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

8 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306720_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 36.9 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' background for fraud and money laundering, requiring responses on convictions, remedial actions, and electronic availability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306720_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for joint bidder authorization, bid submission conditions, cost form completion, subcontractor exclusion, and sanctions compliance, necessary for participating in the Kohtla-Järve city road pothole repair tender.

Lisa 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse vormXLS
Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 11.9 KB

This document is a tender cost form where the bidder must submit their price offer for asphalt concrete pavement pothole repair works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306720_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306720_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

AlusdokumentDOC
AD teede asfaltbetoonkatte auguremont 2026 .d... -- 162.9 KB

The foundational documents for the pothole repair of asphalt concrete pavements in Kohtla-Järve city contain general information and context about the procurement procedure.

AD Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 2026 tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 38.0 KB

The contracting authority is seeking bids for pothole repairs on asphalt surfaces of roads in Kohtla-Järve, involving milling, new asphalt layer application, and crack repair.

AD Lisa 3 Lepingu eelnõuDOC
Lisa 3 Lepingu eelnõu_v.docx -- 36.8 KB

This document is a draft construction contract outlining the terms and obligations for the pothole repair of asphalt concrete pavements in Kohtla-Järve city.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

75
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for pothole repair on Kohtla-Järve city roads is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain documents.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is identified as 'A' (likely open procedure), and there are no immediate flags for disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The use of Hankepass (ESPD) aligns with standard European practices.

Przejrzystość80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are referenced. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. However, the full technical description and contract draft are not directly accessible for immediate review without downloading separate documents, which slightly impacts overall clarity.

Kompletność70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the tender documents are presented as separate files, and while the number of documents is listed, direct links to all content summaries within the main tender notice could be improved. The 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is noted as not supported for AI analysis, indicating a potential accessibility issue for automated systems.

Uczciwość85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, with objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission promotes fairness. The Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard self-declaration tool. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a level playing field.

Praktyczność65/100

The tender utilizes electronic submission and e-procurement, which are practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is given in 'months' for tender validity but the contract start date is specific. The reliance on downloading multiple separate documents for full understanding can be less practical than integrated information.

Spójność danych90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logical and sequential. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period of 2 months aligns with typical practices.

Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Mocne strony

Clear technical requirements and scope of work
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Well-defined basic information and timeline

Wątpliwości

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Potential accessibility issues with certain document formats (e.g., XML ESPD)
Reliance on downloading multiple separate documents for full context

Rekomendacje

1. Incorporate specific green or social procurement objectives.
2. Ensure all essential documents are easily accessible and machine-readable.
3. Provide a more integrated view of tender documents where possible.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u