Tenders

Zakup produktów dla osób z nietrzymaniem moczu dla Centrum Zdrowia Otepää

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 2 dni
Marzec 05, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Dostawy
Numer Referencyjny
306037
Wartość
€115,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 17, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Cost100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 17, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 26, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 05, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 05, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Marzec 15, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€115,000
Duration
36 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Dostawy
76
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€92,792
Śr. liczba ofert
2.2
Konkurencja
Niska
Zwycięzcy MŚP
86%
3,220 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Celem zamówienia jest zawarcie umowy ramowej na zakup produktów dla osób z nietrzymaniem moczu i artykułów medycznych na podstawie nazw i opisów podanych w Załączniku 1 do dokumentów przetargowych.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

10 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (3)
Techniczne (1)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the application form for participation to confirm interest (Annex 2).
--Submit the cost form (Annex 3), detailing product names, descriptions, and unit prices according to the contracting authority's list and estimated quantities.
--Adhere to the general conditions of the open procurement procedure, including specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirm non-existence of exclusion grounds as per Public Procurement Act (criminal background, tax debts, sanctions).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--(For joint bidders) Appoint a representative.
--(For joint bidders) Confirm joint and several liability.
--(For joint bidders) State if the submission is a joint bid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Offered products must meet detailed technical requirements and standards for incontinence products and hospital supplies.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a competitive price, as bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

8 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

VastavustingimusedPDF
306037_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document specifies the requirement for joint bidders to appoint a representative and submit a power of attorney, confirming their joint and several liability, and asks if it's a joint bid and if the power of attorney has been attached.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306037_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that bids for the Otepää Health Centre's incontinence products procurement will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306037_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.8 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide to the conditions and expected information for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the Otepää Health Centre's incontinence product procurement, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 56.5 KB

This document details the technical requirements and standards for the incontinence products to be procured for the Otepää Health Center.

Riigihankes osalemise avaldusDOC
Lisa 2 Riigihankes osalemise avaldus.doc -- 33.0 KB

This document is an application form for participating in the tender, which the bidder must submit to confirm their intent to participate.

MaksumusvormXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumusvorm.xlsx -- 14.0 KB

This document is a pricing form where bidders must provide the names, descriptions, and unit prices of the offered incontinence products according to the contracting authority's list and estimated quantities.

HankepassDOC
Lisa 4 Hankepass.docx -- 18.1 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm they do not meet any of the exclusion criteria specified in the Public Procurement Act, such as criminal background, tax arrears, or sanctions.

RHADDOC
RHAD inko.docx -- 21.7 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the open procurement procedure for a framework agreement for incontinence products and hospital supplies for Otepää Tervisekeskus, including submission requirements and the contract period from 15.03.2026 to 14.03.2029.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

76
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This public procurement is generally well-structured and transparent, but requires clarification regarding the evaluation criteria. The tender provides comprehensive documentation and utilizes e-procurement, enhancing accessibility.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and the submission period of 16 days is reasonable. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic information and the 'solely on cost' criterion detailed in Document 9 and AI-extracted requirements, posing a legal compliance risk.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Przejrzystość80/100

The description of the procurement and its requirements are generally clear and well-documented. However, the conflicting information regarding the evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Kompletność90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and duration. All necessary documents are listed and summarized, ensuring bidders have access to comprehensive details.

Uczciwość85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement ensures equal access for bidders. The evaluation criterion of 'lowest price' is objective and transparent, although the initial inconsistency with 'relative_weighting' could cause initial confusion. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Initial inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Praktyczność75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the opening place URL is provided, a direct URL to the tender documents would further enhance practicality for bidders.

No direct URL to tender documents provided in basic information
Spójność danych60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and the detailed 'evaluated solely on cost' is a significant data inconsistency that could lead to confusion and potential challenges.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Zrównoważony rozwój20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. While common for commodity procurements, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.

Absence of green procurement criteria
Absence of social criteria

Mocne strony

Clear identification of goods and purpose (incontinence products and hospital supplies)
Comprehensive documentation provided, including technical specifications and required forms
Transparency in estimated value and use of e-procurement for accessibility
Clear timeline and contract duration
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price) specified in detail within documents

Wątpliwości

Significant inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Minor ambiguity due to 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value
Absence of a direct URL to tender documents in the basic information

Rekomendacje

1. Clarify and ensure consistency in the stated evaluation criteria across all tender documents and characteristics to avoid ambiguity.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability or social responsibility clauses, where feasible, even for commodity procurements.
3. Provide a direct link to the tender documents for easier access and improved practicality.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u