Tenders

Asfaltowanie ulic miasta Tartu w 2026 r.

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 7 dni
Marzec 09, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
306007
Wartość
€163,934
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 09, 2026
Organizacja
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Offer price100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 09, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 02, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 09, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 09, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€163,934
Duration
4 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
81
Ocena Jakości/100
Doskonała
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Specyfikacja techniczna znajduje się w załączniku do dokumentów podstawowych. Lista obiektów w dokumentach podstawowych i specyfikacji technicznej.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

17 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (6)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (5)
Techniczne (3)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The ESPD must be filled out electronically.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Rules for marking business secrets must be followed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Must meet the exclusion grounds requirements specified in the ESPD.
--Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal convictions or unreliability that would lead to their exclusion during the contract performance stage.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must meet the qualification requirements specified in the ESPD.
--Must comply with EU sanctions when involving subcontractors and suppliers.
--The tenderer must be able to provide information on subcontractors' criminal convictions and reliability during the contract performance stage.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must comply with the technical requirements for street surfacing works in Tartu city.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing the works on the listed street sections according to instructions.
--Works must be carried out in a manner that ensures functional interoperability and compliance with quality and warranty requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted according to the volume table.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

7 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306007_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage, requiring the tenderer to provide answers regarding subcontractors' criminal convictions and trustworthiness.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306007_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.7 KB

This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions for bidders, covering adherence to EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, submission of a power of attorney for joint bids, and rules for marking business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306007_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation methodology for the Tartu city street surfacing tender, where the sole criterion is the offer price, accounting for 100% of the score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306007_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the bidder's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission, as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument_pindamised.docx -- 31.2 KB

This document outlines the general framework, legal basis, and scope of the public procurement for Tartu city street paving in 2026, including general requirements for bidders and procurement process principles.

LepinguprojektDOC
Lepinguprojekt_2026.doc -- 183.0 KB

This document presents the draft contract terms for the 2026 street surfacing works in Tartu, outlining the content of the future agreement for bidders.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline_kirjeldus_pindamised_Tartu_-2026.pd... -- 241.0 KB

This document describes the technical requirements and scope of road surfacing works in Tartu city, listing specific street sections and instructions for execution.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

81
Doskonała

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for Tartu city street surfacing works is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly in its use of electronic processes and justification for not dividing into lots. While comprehensive in documentation, a minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description and a lack of explicit sustainability considerations are noted.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami85/100

The tender appears largely compliant with procurement regulations, featuring reasonable submission timelines, appropriate CPV codes, and a clear justification for not dividing the procurement into lots. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Przejrzystość75/100

The tender's requirements are generally clear and well-documented, with comprehensive AI-extracted requirements. However, there is a minor ambiguity regarding the evaluation criteria, as 'relative_weighting' is stated while Document 4 specifies '100% offer price,' which could cause slight confusion.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% offer price').
Kompletność90/100

All essential basic information, financial details, and timelines are provided. A comprehensive set of 9 documents is attached, including technical specifications, draft contract, and evaluation criteria, ensuring bidders have all necessary information.

The AI could not process the XML ESPD and XLS cost list, which limits full content verification, though their presence indicates completeness.
Uczciwość95/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective evaluation criteria (100% price). The use of e-procurement and a well-reasoned justification for not dividing into lots further enhance transparency and equal access.

Praktyczność85/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, providing an online opening place. Key practical details like contract duration are clearly specified, facilitating bidder participation.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated, though this is common and usually follows contract signing.
Spójność danych75/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting descriptions of the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. '100% offer price' in Document 4).

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Zrównoważony rozwój20/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.

No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Mocne strony

High transparency, especially regarding the justification for not dividing into lots.
Comprehensive documentation provided, including technical specifications and draft contract.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (100% price).
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline (28 days).

Wątpliwości

Minor inconsistency in the description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% offer price').
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
AI could not process all attached documents (XML, XLS), which limits full content verification.

Rekomendacje

1. Clarify and ensure consistency in the description of evaluation criteria across all tender documents.
2. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders, even for smaller projects.
3. Ensure all critical documents are provided in AI-readable formats where possible, or provide summaries for non-standard formats.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u