Tenders

Projektowanie i budowa sieci ciepłowniczych Uus-Roomassaare 35a, Vesikaare 2, Pilve 1 i Pilve 2

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 1 dni
Marzec 04, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
305575
Wartość
€450,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Styczeń 29, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Total cost of the bid100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Styczeń 29, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 25, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 04, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 04, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Marzec 20, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€450,000
Duration
Not specified
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
75
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Projektowanie i budowa sieci ciepłowniczych Uus-Roomassaare 35a, Vesikaare 2, Pilve 1 i Pilve 2. Postępowanie przetargowe będzie prowadzone w trybie odwróconym.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

10 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (2)
Techniczne (2)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable).
--Submit a protocol of the site visit.
--Submit a price offer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must meet the exclusion grounds specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be registered in the Register of Economic Activities (MTR) for the construction and design of district heating systems.
--Bidders must meet the qualification requirements specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provide a welder's attestation.
--The bidder must be capable of performing all stages of district heating pipeline design and construction works, including design, permit application, material procurement, installation, pressure testing, and restoration of pavements, according to the detailed technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial capability requirements are stated; bids will be evaluated based on the total cost excluding VAT.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

6 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

VastavustingimusedPDF
305575_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.3 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, requiring a joint bid power of attorney (if applicable), a site visit protocol, a price list, MTR registration for district heating system construction and design, and a welder's certification.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305575_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This tender for the design and construction of heat pipelines at Uus-Roomassaare 35a, Vesikaare 2, Pilve 1, and Pilve 2 evaluates bids solely based on the total cost excluding VAT, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305575_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions, outlining bidder qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, and is not intended for submission but for familiarization.

Hankelepingu PROJEKTDOC
Hankelepingu projekt_soojustorustiku projekte... -- 30.1 KB

This document is a draft construction contract outlining the general terms and conditions, as well as the details of the contracting parties, between the client and the contractor.

Lisa_2_Tervisepargi torustiku eskiisPDF
Lisa_2_Tervisepargi torustiku eskiis.pdf -- 806.4 KB

This sketch provides an overview of the proposed location and solution for the Health Park heating pipeline, essential for preparing a bid for the design and construction of the Uus-Roomassaare, Vesikaare, and Pilve street pipelines.

Lisa 4_tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa_4_Uus-Roomassaare 35a_Vesikaare 2_Pilve ... -- 20.2 KB

This technical description details the design and construction works for the district heating pipeline connecting Uus-Roomassaare 35a, Vesikaare 2, Pilve 1, and Pilve 2, covering all necessary stages from design and permit application to material procurement, installation, pressure testing, and surface restoration.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

75
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender is generally well-structured with a clear project scope and transparent price-based evaluation. However, the inability to analyze critical technical and pricing documents, coupled with a lack of explicit contract duration and sustainability focus, presents notable areas for improvement.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type as a reverse procedure under Estonian Public Procurement Act § 52 lg 3, and submission deadlines are reasonable. While the CPV code is somewhat broad, it is acceptable. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating compliance with basic legal frameworks.

CPV code (6101) is broad; a more specific code for district heating pipeline construction would be beneficial.
The 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: A' codes are not explicitly defined within the provided information.
Przejrzystość80/100

The project description, AI-extracted requirements, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are clear and unambiguous. Performance conditions are also well-stated. However, the full clarity of the technical specifications and pricing structure cannot be fully assessed due to unanalyzed document formats.

Full clarity of 'Lisa 1_Tehnilised tingimused' (Technical Conditions) and 'Hinnaloend' (Price List) cannot be confirmed as their formats were not supported for AI analysis.
Kompletność70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are comprehensively provided. However, the inability to analyze critical documents like the detailed technical conditions and the price list template significantly impacts the overall completeness assessment. The exact duration of the contract for the works is also not explicitly stated.

Critical documents ('Lisa 1_Tehnilised tingimused' and 'Hinnaloend') were not analyzed, leaving gaps in the detailed technical and pricing requirements.
The specific duration of the contract for the works/project completion timeline is not explicitly stated.
Uczciwość85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement and electronic submission are enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and the justification for not dividing into lots is reasonable.

Lack of specific financial capability requirements might introduce a higher risk regarding bidder financial stability, though it doesn't inherently make the tender unfair.
Praktyczność65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract start date and financing conditions are known. However, the absence of a clear contract duration for the works and the unanalyzed formats of key submission documents (like the price list) could pose practical challenges for bidders in preparing comprehensive offers.

The specific duration of the works or contract completion date is not clearly specified.
The inability to analyze the 'Hinnaloend' (Price List) document may impact the practical ease of preparing a bid if it contains complex formatting or instructions.
Spójność danych90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor inconsistencies exist, such as the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicting the disclosed estimated value, and the initial 'relative_weighting' characteristic being clarified as 100% price.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is inconsistent with the clearly disclosed estimated value of 450,000.00 EUR.
Codes like 'Type: E', 'Procedure: A', and 'Status: 11' are used without explicit definitions within the provided text.
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social aspects or considerations.

Mocne strony

Clear project description and scope.
Transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline.
No evidence of tailored requirements.

Wątpliwości

Critical technical conditions and price list documents were not analyzed due to format, impacting completeness.
Contract duration for the works is not explicitly stated.
No specific financial capability requirements, which could be a risk for a project of this value.
Lack of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Minor data inconsistencies (e.g., 'Value Classified: Yes' vs. disclosed value).

Rekomendacje

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-analyzable formats (e.g., PDF for technical conditions, structured data for price lists) to enhance transparency and completeness.
2. Clearly specify the expected contract duration or project completion timeline in the tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating basic financial capability requirements to ensure bidder stability for projects of this scale.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u