Tenders

Rekonstrukcja budynku Muzeum Narwy Peetri plats 7 i 7/1

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 2 dni
Marzec 05, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
304751
Wartość
€325,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 17, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Offer Cost100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 17, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 26, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 05, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 05, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€325,000
Duration
6 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
75
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Prace rekonstrukcyjne i budowlane w budynku Muzeum Narwy przy Peetri plats 7 i 7/1 zgodnie z projektem budowlanym, w tym opracowanie projektu wstępnego i rysunków wykonawczych, w celu poprawy efektywności energetycznej budynku.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

18 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (9)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (5)
Techniczne (1)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Fill the procurement pass electronically in the information system or ESPD service.
--Submit the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
--Declare any business secrets in the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Subcontractors related to the Russian Federation are not allowed.
--First-tier subcontractors with criminal offenses may be excluded; information on their background regarding criminal offenses must be provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--No subcontractors or suppliers related to the Russian Federation are allowed.
--If submitting as a joint bidder, define representation.
--The responsible person must meet the required qualifications and commit to participating in the project.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Perform reconstruction works including energy efficiency improvement, technical systems upgrade, and adherence to heritage monument requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a detailed cost breakdown using the provided cost proposal form, adhering to specified cost categories.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

11 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304751_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

This document outlines the grounds for exclusion and conditions for checking first-tier subcontractors during the contract performance phase, requiring the tenderer to provide information on subcontractors' backgrounds related to criminal convictions.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304751_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions regarding the non-involvement of Russian-affiliated subcontractors and suppliers, requirements for joint tenderers' representation, and instructions for declaring business secrets within the bid.

HD Lisa 3 Volikiri ühistaotlejate ja -pakkujate esindamiseksDOC
HD Lisa 3 Volikiri ühistaotlejate ja -pakkuja... -- 22.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney template for joint applicants and bidders to authorize one partner to represent them in all public procurement-related actions.

HD Lisa 4 Maksumuse esildise vormXLS
HD Lisa 4 Maksumuse esildise vorm(6253901).xl... -- 53.9 KB

This document is a cost submission form for the Narva Museum building reconstruction public procurement, requiring bidders to provide a detailed breakdown of construction costs according to predefined cost categories.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304751_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, where the primary and sole criterion is the offer cost, accounting for 100% of the weighting.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304751_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 78.5 KB

This document is an explanatory ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) that outlines the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format, but it is not to be filled out or submitted directly; instead, the economic operator must complete the ESPD electronically in the information system or ESPD service.

Hankedokumentide üldosaDOC
HANKEDOKUMENTIDE ÜLDOSA(6232701).docx -- 37.8 KB

This document is the general part of the Narva Museum building reconstruction public procurement, outlining the procurement procedure, the composition of tender documents, and general conditions for submitting bids.

HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus(6253891).docx -- 37.8 KB

This document details the reconstruction works for Narva Museum buildings at Peetri plats 7 and 7/1, focusing on improving energy efficiency, upgrading technical systems, and adhering to heritage protection regulations.

HD Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt(6253881).docx -- 52.4 KB

This document is a draft contract for the reconstruction works of the Narva Museum building, outlining the legal relationship between the Client and the Contractor and the scope of the agreement.

HD Lisa 5 Vastutava isiku kinnitusDOC
HD Lisa 5 Vastutava isiku kinnitus(6244221).d... -- 17.8 KB

This document is a confirmation from a responsible person, stating they meet the required qualifications for the tender and commit to participating in the Narva Museum building reconstruction project.

HD Lisa 6 Hankelepingu täitmise kohaga tutvumise aktDOC
HD Lisa 6 Hankelepingu täitmise kohaga tutvum... -- 18.4 KB

This document is an act confirming the tenderer's familiarization with the contract performance site for the Narva Museum building reconstruction public procurement.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

75
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for the reconstruction of Narva Museum buildings is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-procurement, but exhibits minor inconsistencies and lacks explicit social and innovation sustainability criteria.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including the use of ESPD and NUTS codes, and the exclusion of Russian-affiliated subcontractors. However, the contradiction between the stated 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified: Yes' is a minor disclosure inconsistency.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified: Yes'
Przejrzystość80/100

The description of the works, AI-extracted requirements, and evaluation criteria are clear and unambiguous. The sole criterion being 100% cost-based is highly transparent. The inability to analyze XML and ASICE documents by AI is a limitation of the analysis tool, not necessarily the tender's clarity.

Kompletność70/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, and location, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. However, the inability to process XML and ASICE document formats means that some potential content might not have been fully assessed for completeness.

Two tender documents (XML, ASICE) could not be processed for content analysis.
Uczciwość85/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access, objective and transparent evaluation criteria (100% cost), and support for e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. The contradiction regarding value classification is a minor point that could cause confusion.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified: Yes'
Praktyczność65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, a specific contract start date is not provided, and explicit document URLs are not listed (though implied by the system).

No specific contract start date provided.
Explicit document URLs are not listed in the provided information.
Spójność danych90/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency is the direct contradiction between the disclosed 'Estimated Value' and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 325,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' characteristics and focuses on improving energy efficiency, which is a positive environmental aspect. It is also EU funded, often implying higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks social criteria and an innovation focus, as noted by automated checks.

Lack of explicit social criteria.
Absence of an innovation focus.

Mocne strony

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% cost-based).
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements, well-categorized.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Explicit focus on green procurement and energy efficiency.
Good legal compliance with EU/national regulations, including subcontractor restrictions.

Wątpliwości

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 325,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Lack of explicit social criteria in the tender.
Absence of an innovation focus in the requirements.
Inability to analyze XML and ASICE document formats by AI, potentially hiding details.
No specific contract start date, only duration.

Rekomendacje

1. Clarify the discrepancy regarding the estimated value being classified versus disclosed.
2. Consider incorporating explicit social criteria and encouraging innovative solutions in future tenders.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-analyzable formats for comprehensive review.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u