Sukcesywne dostawy artykułów spożywczych w roku 2026

This tender for successive food supplies in 2026 is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization details, and a CPV code. The procedure type is indicated, and multiple required documents are listed. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' for the full tender documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria are minor procedural omissions.

The title and description are clear, indicating the subject matter and timeframe. The CPV code provides specific classification. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas bidders must address. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. Several essential tender documents are attached and summarized. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, which are significant omissions.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes accessibility. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are standard. The absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could potentially lead to less transparency, but there are no overt signs of tailoring to specific companies.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics' stating 'E-Procurement'. The contract start date and financing information are not provided, and the contract duration is missing.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, deadline, and CPV code are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The main inconsistency is the conflicting information regarding e-submission.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender focuses solely on the supply of food products.