SONI069 Usługi w zakresie ochrony środowiska i planowania

This tender is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, CPV code, and a submission deadline. The procedure type is specified. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond the CPV code are minor omissions.

The description of services is clear, outlining the need for Public Planning, Ecology, and Environmental services related to Grid Development. The reference to 'Scope of Requirements' documents indicates where detailed requirements can be found. However, the lack of specific evaluation criteria within the main tender notice reduces overall clarity.

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are present. The contract duration is also specified. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in the AI-extracted section indicate a lack of completeness in the provided information.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is competitive, and the CPV code is provided, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. Access to full documents is implied but not explicitly confirmed as fully accessible without content.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The dates provided are logical, with the contract start date aligning with the submission deadline. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common areas for sustainability considerations in public tenders.