Remont ulicy Grunwaldzkiej w Gościnie.

This tender for road renovation in Gościno provides essential documentation and follows standard procurement procedures, but lacks detail on evaluation criteria and estimated value, impacting clarity and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement in Poland. The CPV code is provided, and the presence of multiple required documents suggests adherence to procedural norms. However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date for the tender notice could pose minor compliance issues or create uncertainty. The deadline of March 30, 2026, for a contract starting on or after that date is reasonable for an active tender.

The core subject of the tender, 'Remont ulicy Grunwaldzkiej w Gościnie,' is clear, and the technical specifications document provides detailed scope. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the project's financial scope and how proposals will be assessed.

The tender includes a comprehensive set of documents covering exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical and financial requirements, and the scope of work. Key information such as contract duration and submission deadline are present. The main deficiency is the undisclosed estimated value, which is a significant piece of information for completeness.

The tender promotes fairness by providing full access to all 12 documents, including technical specifications and contract templates. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator. However, the absence of a disclosed estimated value prevents bidders from a fully informed assessment of proportionality and potential profitability, and the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessment.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. A contract duration of 60 months is specified, providing clarity for long-term planning. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential reliance on non-electronic submission methods which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, and financing information is not readily available.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, deadline, CPV code, and contract duration are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline 2026-03-30) are logically consistent for an active tender.

The tender documentation does not explicitly mention any provisions for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often brings with it specific sustainability requirements.