Eesti Maaülikooli veterinaarmeditsiini ja loomakasvatuse instituudi väikeloomakliiniku ideekonkurss

This document only sets out the mandatory “no-organised-crime/no-corruption” declarations that every first-tier subcontractor must submit before contract signing; it gives no information on the architectural competition’s design brief, evaluation criteria or bidder qualifications, so firms cannot decide whether to bid from this file alone.

This is an architectural design ideas competition (not a works contract) for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ small-animal clinic extension: participants must confirm they hold the copyright to their entry, will accept the follow-on negotiated-procurement contract terms, and certify that any Russian-linked subcontractors/tier-2 suppliers will stay below 10 % of contract value (mandatory compliance).

This is a 100% design-quality-driven architectural ideas competition where the sole mandatory requirement is to impress an anonymous jury with a modern, campus-integrated, user-focused and economically feasible concept for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ new small-animal clinic building—no fees, no licenses, no previous references are specified, so any architect or team may enter.

This is an open architectural design competition (not a mandatory prequalification round) for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ small-animal clinic extension, so any firm may submit a concept proposal, but only those with demonstrated high-level veterinary or educational facility portfolio, adequate staff size and financial capacity (to be declared in the ESPD) will be competitive.

This document is merely a site-location diagram (“asendiskeem”) for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ planned small-animal clinic, showing the future building plot against an orthophoto backdrop—no design brief, mandatory requirements, qualification criteria or evaluation rules are included, so it gives bidders no basis for a go/no-go decision.

This urban-planning extract merely shows the Tartu general plan zoning around the Estonian University of Life Sciences campus (higher-education land, max 3–5 storeys, 7–30 % site coverage) and does not state any mandatory design requirements, qualification criteria or evaluation scheme for the veterinary small-animal clinic architectural ideas contest, so it gives bidders no basis on which to decide whether to compete.

This document is merely a site-plan (scale 1:500) that inventories existing utilities, greenery and boundary conditions for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ small-animal-clinic architectural-idea competition; it contains no mandatory requirements, qualification criteria or evaluation scheme for bidders—only background topography.

This is a site-planning drawing (scale 1:500) for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ small-animal clinic idea competition, showing mandatory buildable footprints (3,000 m² extension + 1,000 m² utility/waste zone), required outdoor enclosures, parking counts and existing services that any bidding architectural team must incorporate into their high-quality campus-compatible design.

This is a 7.5-ha detail-planning document (not a tender) prepared by Kobras OÜ for Eesti Maaülikool that merely establishes the building rights and land-use framework for a future small-animal clinic extension on the Kreutzwaldi 62 campus in Tartu; it contains no architectural design brief, no qualification criteria and no procurement rules, so it is not a bid opportunity—only background material that architects may later consult once the real architectural design competition is announced.

This technical drawing (DP21014_Tehnovõrgud) is a supporting infrastructure plan for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ architectural design competition, showing mandatory utility networks and site constraints that any bidding architect must incorporate into their concept for the small-animal clinic extension.

Open architectural design contest (no mandatory pre-qualification beyond legal capacity to contract) seeking the best concept for a small-animal clinic extension at the Estonian University of Life Sciences campus—winner (or 2nd/3rd prize) may be invited to negotiate the subsequent design-service contract, but the university is not obliged to build the scheme.

One-stage architectural design competition (mandatory entry) seeks a high-quality, climate-positive 4-storey small-animal clinic that integrates with the Estonian University of Life Sciences campus and existing building; bidders must be qualified architects able to deliver a functional, bio-secure veterinary teaching complex in two construction phases.

This document is merely the detailed room schedule (2,533 m² of small-animal clinic spaces on two levels) for the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ architectural design competition; it lists required rooms and sizes but contains no mandatory bidder qualifications, evaluation criteria or submission rules, so firms should treat it only as background data and seek the full competition brief before deciding to participate.

This is a technical design brief (Lisa 5) for the University of Tartu’s small-animal clinic architectural competition, detailing mandatory room-by-room space-program, MEP, and imaging-equipment requirements (CT, X-ray, MRI) that competitors must integrate into a high-quality architectural concept seamlessly connected to the existing campus building.

This draft design-contract template (Lisa 6) merely lists the future clauses the Estonian University of Life Sciences will insert—mandatory full-scope veterinary-clinic design through main project stage (plus optional working-project), 5 % performance bond, no advance payment, designer obtains permits and carries 24-month site supervision—so bidders should view it only as a preview of terms, not as qualification or evaluation criteria.