33862 Usługa carsharingu

This tender for a car-sharing service is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and a defined reveal date for submissions, impacting transparency and potentially fairness.

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and regulatory compliance. The procedure type (negotiations with prior call for competition) is specified. The absence of disputes and a clear procedure contributes positively. However, the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural gap.

The tender provides a clear title, description, and lists mandatory requirements such as exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities. The availability of numerous documents, including technical specifications and contract conditions, enhances clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. A substantial number of tender documents are provided. However, the missing reveal date and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria mean that not all essential information for a complete understanding of the submission process is present.

The tender appears fair, with full document access and disclosed value. The procedure type is standard. The criteria for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are listed, suggesting an objective approach. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and while financing is implied by the EU funding, specific details are absent. The duration is specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission, opening) are logical. The contract duration is also clearly stated. The tender is active, indicating current relevance.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, leading to a moderate score in this category.