(PI-11655/26) Usługi wyboru oceny oddziaływania na środowisko

This tender for environmental impact assessment services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a substantial number of supporting documents. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration and financing.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and provides necessary classification codes. Deadlines are present, and the procedure type is specified. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance based on the provided data. The submission deadline appears to be unusually far in the future, which could be flagged as a potential issue depending on the context of a dynamic purchasing system.

The title and basic description are clear, and CPV codes are provided. The AI-extracted requirements list general categories. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a clear contract duration impacts the overall clarity for potential bidders. The content of many attached documents is not summarized, hindering immediate understanding.

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code is present. A significant number of documents are attached. However, crucial details like the contract duration and specific financing information are missing, and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria also reduces completeness.

The tender utilizes an e-procurement system, which promotes transparency. The estimated value is disclosed. The procedure is restricted, which is permissible, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies based on the provided information. Full document access is implied by the number of attachments.

The tender is identified as e-procurement, which is positive. However, there is no explicit mention of a contract start date, nor is the contract duration specified. The financing information is also absent. While documents are attached, a clear URL for e-submission beyond the general e-procurement mention could enhance practicality.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and CPV code are populated consistently. Dates are logically presented, although the submission deadline is very distant. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender does not indicate that it is EU funded. This area is therefore underdeveloped.